Mumorn
Vic Buckingham
He was always closed down before he could do much. But I liked what I saw, what he tried to do with speed etc.
Japan have really worked to close them down. Second half it should open up.
hehe then he goes and shuts me up
He was always closed down before he could do much. But I liked what I saw, what he tried to do with speed etc.
Japan have really worked to close them down. Second half it should open up.
Just scored. SIGN HIM UP DANNY!!!!!
Okay he scored and he looks good but is he really what we are missing?
I am not sure about that.
Would we have got more points if Sandro had not been injured?
How many goals has Sandro scored?
Can Parker support an attack effectively?
etc/
yes we would...his goals are not the factor, i's his read of the game and his distribution...
Judging on last night's performance this guy is more a Lampard than a Parker. Even his goal was Lampard-esque.
Yep lets sign him up he looked good and offers more of a goal threat then sandro, a midfield power house two of sandro and paulinho would fit in with AVB's style i think.
Chelsea didn't have a playmaker in their title winning midfields either - Makelele/Essien/Lampard is quite similar in style to Sandro/Dembele/Paulinho. I agree that if given the choice I'd rather have a playmaker but perhaps we're going down the line of having a powerful and industrious midfield three with one of those able to get you goals(Paulinho) and then having lots of goals in the front three.
Those of you that have seen more of Paulinho than me, how is he when it comes to passing and creativity compared to Dembele for example?
Chelsea didn't have a playmaker in their title winning midfields either - Makelele/Essien/Lampard is quite similar in style to Sandro/Dembele/Paulinho. I agree that if given the choice I'd rather have a playmaker but perhaps we're going down the line of having a powerful and industrious midfield three with one of those able to get you goals(Paulinho) and then having lots of goals in the front three.
Chelsea didn't have a playmaker in their title winning midfields either - Makelele/Essien/Lampard is quite similar in style to Sandro/Dembele/Paulinho. I agree that if given the choice I'd rather have a playmaker but perhaps we're going down the line of having a powerful and industrious midfield three with one of those able to get you goals(Paulinho) and then having lots of goals in the front three.
AVB though is a much more attacking manager than Mourinho though. He likes to win through possession, rather than discipline.
AVB's Porto midfield was Fernando (Sandro), Guarin (Dembele) and Moutinho (Carroll).
Paulinho is very much another Guarin/Dembele.
Chelsea didn't have a playmaker in their title winning midfields either - Makelele/Essien/Lampard is quite similar in style to Sandro/Dembele/Paulinho. I agree that if given the choice I'd rather have a playmaker but perhaps we're going down the line of having a powerful and industrious midfield three with one of those able to get you goals(Paulinho) and then having lots of goals in the front three.