monkeybarry
Tom Huddlestone
I guess he's not entertainedAnge looks shell-shocked.
I guess he's not entertainedAnge looks shell-shocked.
With his in mind you change your system. But no. It's still all out attack with a suicidal high line. We are too easy to play against.3 reserves in defence. 3 kids in midfield. No striker. Best chance of the game missed. Stonewall pen not given.
All Ange’s fault I see.
Vicario3 reserves in defence. 3 kids in midfield. No striker. Best chance of the game missed. Stonewall pen not given.
All Ange’s fault I see.
Who would you have picked?
It’s a weird back 5I am not watching - If it is not a back 4 then Ange has changed his system. Bit risky to do that and suggests the pressure has been getting to him.
He doesn't have an always play clause in his contract, nobody does, such a load of crap.So who didnt he pick from the available players (aside from Son who I suspect has an always-plays clause in his contract)?
I agree on the Son discussion. I am saying aside from Son and ST, which other players could he use?I wouldn't play 3-5-2 with only 2 fit CBs, I would play a striker up top regardless, at 2 nil at least we would have given Lanks minutes in the bank, given we could be 4 down now we lose nothing doing that
3 reserves in defence. 3 kids in midfield. No striker. Best chance of the game missed. Stonewall pen not given.
All Ange’s fault I see.
Pair of fudging cowardsAt least son is visible. Don't see much of maddison at all
At least son is visible. Don't see much of maddison at all
Why not pick players to their strengths and change the tactics to enhance the players not expose them … regularlySo who didnt he pick from the available players (aside from Son who I suspect has an always-plays clause in his contract)?
What's the plan here? 3-4-3 with Gray RCB in defense and then 4-3-3 with Gray RCM in attack?