Not sure you can assert that all our players are good enough.As you know i agree with your opinion that we should actually try and win something, we can not be called a top team UNTILL we actually start winning trophys. At the game yesterday a lot of fans were saying that some of our players are not good enough and until we uprate our squad we will always struggle in these games, i have noticed there are those on here who are saying ( in some of the players threads) more or less the same thing.
There is nothing wrong with most of our back up players and to say ( like some do that they are not good enough) is foolish at best and ignorant at worst. The problem is not the individual players its the fact that we made 9 changes once again, it no surprise that as a team we fail to have structure, understanding and cohesion. Playing with two three four changes is a lot easier for us ( and understandable on occasions) but once again we struggled with so many in one game.
It is a football club, there are always players who will not make the grade, it is deciding who to keep and for how long. Managers and fans may sometimes make decisions which are premature but they are entitled to their opinions. Hopefully, whatever these are one should be open to review them in the face of emerging evidence.
CCV and Onomah may make it, they need more experience imo, but they are not a level where we can give them enough, hence loans.
Janssen may adapt. Probably needs a miscue to begin his free play goals. Same with Sissoko and his goals.
Winks shows more advancement for his stage of development.
There is a time limit as clubs can't wait forever for potential to be fulfilled.