glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
It was tongue in cheek, but Rangers are really poor.
That's fine but on what metric are you basing that on? Would Brighton beat them easily for example?
It was tongue in cheek, but Rangers are really poor.
The metric of results and their performances. Yes Brighton would and every premier league team 99 times out of 100.That's fine but on what metric are you basing that on? Would Brighton beat them easily for example?
The metric of results and their performances. Yes Brighton would and every premier league team 99 times out of 100.
Play a mix like in the previous games.Erm ok, well on that basis, we should indeed be able to play the kids when we go to Ibrox...right??
I’ve got two (and possibly a third - TBC) tickets going spare for tomorrow night. They’re entirely free and there’s no catch. If anyone wants them please DM me - first come first served.
Pro: they’re free
Con: you’re sat next to me.
49 1/2 actuallyYou'll recognise him as he'll be the 50 year old, 24 stone, bald bloke with COYS tattoo on his bare chest.
Sitting at tebay having a coffee and croissants for breakfast.
Unfortunately not heading south for the game, heading to Brighton and then Totnes for weekend.
Though about squeezing in tonight's game and Sunday's but it was just too much of a squeeze.
Need to find a pub in Brighton for tonight.
Sitting at tebay having a coffee and croissants for breakfast.
Unfortunately not heading south for the game, heading to Brighton and then Totnes for weekend.
Though about squeezing in tonight's game and Sunday's but it was just too much of a squeeze.
Need to find a pub in Brighton for tonight.
Sons not playing apparently due to issues from Saturday, aches and what knot.Think I'd prefer a strong team put out, get the points and then worry about the kids getting minutes.
Davies at lb and porro starting on the right, I think gray would have a hard match tonight, not that porros massively better defensively but it would keep them on their toes at least.
Bergvall probably being the only youngster to start but that assumes TW, Richy and BJ up front, if Moore or odombert starts I'd be tempted to play sarr biss and bent in the middle for a bit of experience and physicality.
So that's my thinking, odds on it's a pure academy team with Son for minutes
Oooooo, I actually forgot this was on tonight, looking for a big performance. But I would play
Richy ---------- Lankshear ---------- Johnson
Berg ---------------------------- Kulu
Bentancur
Udogie/Young LB --- VdV --- Dragusin --- Gray
Vicario.
If we had put Djed on the list, stupid not too.
I would have gone
Richy --------------- Lankshear ---------------- PorroWith Moore and Gray coming on for Richy and Bents later in the game... Or Richy moving centre and Moore replacing Lanksher.
Berg ---------------------------- Kulu
Bentancur
Reg/Youngster ---- VdV ----- Dragusin ---- Djed.
Vic
I know, it was just something I would like to see and Richy playing left would solve an issue their for us.Not going to happen
- Richi will play CF most likely with Werner LW
- Deki highly unlikely to start (he needs to be rotated)
- My preference would be to rest VDV over Romero
- Off chance Maddison starts considering he didn't play full 90 on week-end
9 changes….
Starting XI: Forster; Gray, Dragusin, Davies, Udogie; Bentancur, Bergvall, Maddison (c); Werner, Richarlison, Moore.
Substitutes: Vicario, Austin, Pedro Porro, Romero, Van de Ven, Sarr, Bissouma, Kulusevski, Odobert, Johnson, Solanke, Lankshear.