SteveAWOL
Barry Daines
The first time since 2013 that Villa have taken 3pts away after conceding the first goal
We had 10+ weeks to do a deal for him. Villa were desperate for the money. They had a tax bill that needed to be paid otherwise they would’ve been wound up. The manager and player had spoke, everything was aligned except our penny pinching chairman. After 10+ weeks of low ball bids Villa got new investment and suddenly we found the £25m fee only for their new investors to block it. On deadline day we offered £35m.... £35m for a player that we could’ve signed for £25m on days 1, 2, 3, 4..... 70 of the window. Only in Daniel Levy’s mind is a player worth £10m more on deadline day than day 1 of the window. Imagine if we had a chairman who wanted to get player in early so his manager had time to work with them?... I’m really looking forward to our chairman spending the £100m we’ll get for Kane this summer....Call it what you want, its the truth. As you well know. Levy has made mistakes and no one ( as far as i can see) can not see that, but you are wrong about Grealish and as i said before as long as you keep peddling that brick i will reply to it.
Kane and Son are the first two to go.... why would either stay?Well that was fun.
I honestly wouldn’t mind if we replaced the whole squad, minus Kane and Son. Get in a promising young manager that will inject some passion, fight and belief back into this club. Then maybe in a few years we will get lucky and win and odd cup. And that’s pretty much all we can look forward to, unless we get bought up by some multi billionaire and become a financially doped club like your Man Cities and Chelseas. Depressing fudging times.
To be fair Son has been disgraceful the second half of the season, £100m for a streaky player is a good bit of businessKane and Son are the first two to go.... why would either stay?
We had 10+ weeks to do a deal for him. Villa were desperate for the money. The manager and player had spoke, everything was aligned except our penny pinching chairman. After 10+ weeks of low ball bids Villa got new investment and suddenly we found the £25m fee only for their new investors to block it. On deadline day we offered £35m.... £35m for a player that we could’ve signed for £25m on days 1, 2, 3, 4..... 70 of the window. Only in Daniel Levy’s mind is a player worth £10m more on deadline day than day 1 of the window. I’m again even if we had a chairman who wanted to get player in early so his manager had time to work with them?... I’m really looking forward to our chairman spending the £100m we’ll get for Kane this summer....
£100m?To be fair Son has been disgraceful the second half of the season, £100m for a streaky player is a good bit of business
If they go, they go, I don’t think anyone would blame them. I just meant that those are the only two players I would keep if possible.Kane and Son are the first two to go.... why would either stay?
Kane and Son are the first two to go.... why would either stay?
He'd be the first player I'd look to move on. Getting towards the end of his contract, 29 in the summer and it's going to be now or never to get a good price for him.To be fair Son has been disgraceful the second half of the season, £100m for a streaky player is a good bit of business
Ndombele. He created something from the second he came on.Awful performance. Not sure that anyone played well, or even put in an average performance, perhaps Bergwijn
You in cloud cuckoo land if you think fans can be heardI think ENIC's PR machine is going to have a fascinating job on their hands to manage all of Derp The ESL piece has awakened in all fans the knowledge that if their voices can be heard, change can happen. So you have a certain section more energised, but you also have the fact that we are clearly being managed back towards a level that ENIC are comfortable with, after overachieving to a point that they never thought they would get to that soon.
I'm sure they wouldn't trade the CL run for the PR problem they now have, but having to explain why we have been allowed to regress...it's going to be really interesting to see how they attempt to keep the fans on side. When you add in ESL fallout and Kane wanting to leave, how do they do it.
Of course, the real answer is they spend everything the club generates, and 'pushing on' from the position we got ourselves to wasn't possible, unless they chucked more money in, which they don't want to do. But at what point are fans broadly going to stop being ok with it, given the club showed what was possible with smart investment, great coaching and good strategy? At what point does paying £60 for no trophies stop being ok? They never intended for us to be a regular CL club that quickly, and now they have to explain why, in a way that gets most of the fans back onside.
This may have been covered elsewhere but one of my pals (spurs) sent me a screenshot of an article saying 27 players have left spurs since 2008 (our last trophy, if you need reminding) and gone on to win silverware.
I know we have sold a lot in that time but that's shocking.
You in cloud cuckoo land if you think fans can be heard
The only thing that gets heard are some boos
That major overhaul does need to be ok'd by the chairman though. Unless of course he doesn't feel it's necessary.gonad*s, keep on thinking that and we will never get anywhere, we need a major overall of players and if we do not do that we will keep going through managers.
They don’t careThey're putting a fan on the board.
Why do you think Levy employs Donna Cullen in such a close role? PR and the consent of the fans is quite important to them. The narrative that they are ambitious is important to them. Flying around Europe trying to get Aguero and Dybala and juuuuust coming short are important stories for them to have out there.
They play a PR game because they need the fans onside. Too many protests at too loud a voice starts to weaken their position.
That major overhaul does need to be ok'd by the chairman though. Unless of course he doesn't feel it's necessary.