• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

OMT - Totteham vs Swansea - Season Recovery Edition

Spursalot said:
More so then Thudd or Carroll.


Livermore has the advantage that he can actually run, and carroll is the better ball player.
Click to expand...

I think Livermore does nothing. Jenas is twice the player he is. But then again thats just an opinion.

When you replace parker or Sandro with Livermore, you really change the quality of the team. We need better players than him.
 
charlietheyid said:
I think Livermore does nothing. Jenas is twice the player he is. But then again thats just an opinion.

When you replace parker or Sandro with Livermore, you really change the quality of the team. We need better players than him.
Click to expand...


Yup. We do need better players than him. However we've not got any.


Thudd changes the quality just as much, and doesn't have the legs for the team pressing game.
 
lets-do-this.jpg
 
I assumed he would pick Naughton over BAE for this one. Perhaps he wants Naughton to be orthodox and defend against their pacey wingers/forwards? Perhaps he sees BAE as a little too maverick for this opposition? All a guess of course. I thought he might opt for Verts on the left if not Naughton.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back