• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*** Official Film Thread ***

Grays_1890 said:
I likes it....B movie trash nut decent

Aliens was brilliant, bit of a throw back to the originals

Went to see Megalopolis and it was utter garbage......made zero sense and was a film for film sake
Click to expand...

Agreed about Megalopolis, surprised to discover that it was shorter than The Substance as it felt like days had passed by the time it finally finished :sleeping:
 
Jurgen the German said:
Anyone brave enough to watch that GHod awful new Terrifier film?
Click to expand...

See that multiplexes showed the first 2 Terrifier movies as a double feature the other week to whet people’s appetite but The Substance was enough gore for me for September!

I might use Unlimited card to check out 3rd film though, as guessing the plot isn’t too important.
 
Grays_1890 said:
I likes it....B movie trash nut decent

Aliens was brilliant, bit of a throw back to the originals

Went to see Megalopolis and it was utter garbage......made zero sense and was a film for film sake
Click to expand...

I had a different take. Coppola's death note Swansong, kitchen-sinked it with all sorts of chicanery, I thought his 'plot/story' was fairly simple (albeit the strands were flying in wind) and there was enough gratuitouness to keep me entertained. I liked the fact that it was a totally unapologetic film with zero fudges given for anything other than what he wanted; punk rock at its truest!
 
thfcsteff said:
I had a different take. Coppola's death note Swansong, kitchen-sinked it with all sorts of chicanery, I thought his 'plot/story' was fairly simple (albeit the strands were flying in wind) and there was enough gratuitouness to keep me entertained. I liked the fact that it was a totally unapologetic film with zero fudges given for anything other than what he wanted; punk rock at its truest!
Click to expand...
That's film and art for you I suppose, the last part absolutely, thay was the positive take away for me. But I also felt that fed I to the rest and why IMO it was a heavily laden mess. Stellar cast without many standout performances and some truely odd ones in to boot.

Maybe I need to watch again, let's see ha
 
Grays_1890 said:
That's film and art for you I suppose, the last part absolutely, thay was the positive take away for me. But I also felt that fed I to the rest and why IMO it was a heavily laden mess. Stellar cast without many standout performances and some truely odd ones in to boot.

Maybe I need to watch again, let's see ha
Click to expand...

I think -in fairness- everything you've said is equally accurate. I suppose it depends on the approach to it. I personally decided not to read reviews and committed to seeing it on the biggest screen left available. I also went in giving Coppola a lot of leeway. That all helped TBH...
 
Saw Conclave. Prescreening at bfta. I really enjoyed it but was tripping on some mushroom chocolate 😂😅 nice film and Fines is spectacular. Stanly tuchel pretty awesome too. Storyline was a bit too obvious. But I liked the film and how it makes a viewer question their relationship to Catholicism
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back