spurspinter1
Pat van den Hauwe
If given the opportunity, Stuart Pearce would probably get borussia dortmund relegated
Nah, Caulker's still got a lot of potential imo.
Appalling defending for the 2nd goal by him though.
We haven't looked great so far have we?
Why carroll is not out there i would love to know, i thought we were trying to get passers into the side. I remember reading someone say that the under 21 coaches do not actually go round the different academies but just see who makes it to the first team.
Tim Sherwood said that about why some of the good players don't get picked, basically that the sides are picked on reputation rather than ability and form.
I wonder how people like Platt, Wilkinson and Pearce have had the chance to be in charge of the U21 setup. A proper youth coach would be a better idea, no? someone who actually knows what is happening at youth level, bringing through some U18/19/20 players as well. Maybe they just think these guys are (mostly) Prem players so they should be good enough. The 2 performances so far show that the side is sent out with no ideas and no tactics.
Picking physical players makes it easy to bully other teams and win games, but it only works until a certain age. And they wonder why so few English players get a chance in the Premier League? LOL
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...ein-wants-English-players-Premier-League.html
It's actually 37%, or was last season. Still the largest nationality, problem is that the pricetags:ability doesn't match up and the quota forces clubs to pay over the odds for inferior players. Or do what City did and pick up dead ducks like Richard Wright on a free.
60% for Germany is impressive, it shows their system is working. The Premier League chases profits though, the best product needs the best players and they aren't English. That needs to change.
The problem with Caulker, I think, is that he gets turned too easily.
I wonder how people like Platt, Wilkinson and Pearce have had the chance to be in charge of the U21 setup. A proper youth coach would be a better idea, no? someone who actually knows what is happening at youth level, bringing through some U18/19/20 players as well. Maybe they just think these guys are (mostly) Prem players so they should be good enough. The 2 performances so far show that the side is sent out with no ideas and no tactics.
Think it will drop further with many academies now focusing on foreign players. Those that come through in the lower leagues aren't exactly schooled in pass and move.
I'd make Glenn Hoddle in charge of U21 to be honest, or in fact, I'd try to make Arsene Wenger U21 boss and head of talent development with Hoddle in charge of a younger age group.
Worth way more than what's invested in buildings and senior manager. I'd rather have a senior player pick the first team and save the money spent on someone like Hodgson/Svennis - if that is what it'd take to get quality coaching into the youth department.
That seems like a bit of a reactionary view considering the U21s record going into this tournament. However, with his contract coming to an end this will have to be the end for Pearce with the U21s.
From memory both Platt and Pearce were considered to be promising coaches with the potential to become Senior team managers in the future. In hindsight that may have been wrong in both cases, but the U21s have had decent records under both of them plus Peter Taylor in the past. Wilkinson was slightly different but wasn't the dinosaur that some seem to remember him as being. In his time at the FA he was actually one of the first to push for a more coordinated approach to youth development through the national team structures.
Specialist youth coaches are the way forward but it's only relatively recently that anyone in the UK has been taking that approach.
The style in which the development teams play has to be part of a coordinated approach across the game in England, as shown through one of the big criticisms of Pearce being that he has been too result focused.
That seems like a bit of a reactionary view considering the U21s record going into this tournament. However, with his contract coming to an end this will have to be the end for Pearce with the U21s.
From memory both Platt and Pearce were considered to be promising coaches with the potential to become Senior team managers in the future. In hindsight that may have been wrong in both cases, but the U21s have had decent records under both of them plus Peter Taylor in the past. Wilkinson was slightly different but wasn't the dinosaur that some seem to remember him as being. In his time at the FA he was actually one of the first to push for a more coordinated approach to youth development through the national team structures.
Specialist youth coaches are the way forward but it's only relatively recently that anyone in the UK has been taking that approach.
The style in which the development teams play has to be part of a coordinated approach across the game in England, as shown through one of the big criticisms of Pearce being that he has been too result focused.
When you're coaching a youth team it's not about how many games you win. You need coaches who care more about developing players than boosting their CV in hope of getting a managerial position at a club. This is why I don't understand why the FA targets well known players for coaching positions with the various national teams.