Enter the Pitbull
Luke Young
Would McCLaren put on a really fake mockney accent in his first press con?
Would McCLaren put on a really fake mockney accent in his first press con?
AVB managed Chelsea
Lambert and Rodgers manage Norwich and Swansea
I hope you see the difference and why its expected that Chelsea win more games than the other two clubs, newly promoted at that
What do you think of Steve McClaren? would you like him at Spurs. Not so long ago rated as a hot young coach, worked successfully with Fergie at Utd, went to Middlesborough and won them their only major silverware, took Boro to a UEFA cup final, yes little Boro, has managed England, won the Eredivisie with FC Twente, the only time in their history they have won the Eredivisie, surely Steve McClaren has a pedigree that stands up to the great achievements of the magical AVB??
ahhh, but wait, im not sure if McClaren has ever slept at the training grounds of the clubs hes worked for. Probably he is not that dedicated then. Oh well, AVB must be the man to take over from Redknapp
Would McCLaren put on a really fake mockney accent in his first press con?
As for McLaren, going by your argument, what do you think of Phil Brown? Would you like him at Spurs? Not so long ago gained promotion with an unfancied Hull City squad, secured memorable wins over Arsenal, Tottenham and the like, played some expansive football at first and kept Hull City in the top six until Christmas and got them to the quarter-finals of the FA Cup for the first time in thirty-eight years. Surely Phil Brown has a pedigree that stands up to the great achievements of the magical Brendan Rodgers?
Ah, but there you judge the managers from different viewpoints. AVB managed Chelsea, therefore he was expected to win games. However, AVB had to deal with ageing players refusing to adopt his methods, a slow, creaky back-line, massive expectations with Chelsea believing him to be the second coming of Mourinho, a misfiring waste of fifty million pounds he had to play up front and couldn't drop due to the owner's infatuation with him, and a failure to acquire any of his principal transfer targets (Gregory Van Der wiel, Falcao and Modric). Rodgers and Lambert, on the other hand, were promoted with no expectations on them, and solid, united squads to work with that didn't mutiny every second day. Ergo, Rodgers and Lambert over-achieve and Villas-Boaes under-achieves, despite what Villas boas had to deal with being arguably harder than what Lambert and Rodgers have to deal with.
As for McLaren, going by your argument, what do you think of Phil Brown? Would you like him at Spurs? Not so long ago gained promotion with an unfancied Hull City squad, secured memorable wins over Arsenal, Tottenham and the like, played some expansive football at first and kept Hull City in the top six until Christmas and got them to the quarter-finals of the FA Cup for the first time in thirty-eight years. Surely Phil Brown has a pedigree that stands up to the great achievements of the magical Brendan Rodgers?
You attempted to belittle his Porto achievements by comparing them to winning the SPL - largerly innacurate, imv all things considered. Perhaps it is you who should review your point, just an idea
wow, actually i didnt realise AVB had so many problems at Chelsea, in fact he did a great job there keeping them in 5th place. silly me
and actually after reading what you wrote im disappointed in Lambert and Rodgers. Norwich and Swansea should be in the top 4, i dont think they have over achieved at all. Under achieved more like!! Sack 'em!!
Phil Brown is no Steve McClaren. Sorry! give me a better example please
Phil Brown is what Rodgers could become. Their careers are nearly identical in terms of tangible achievements. If Mclaren is the same as AVB, then Phil Brown is the same as Brendan Rodgers. I'm happy though, that when we finish 17th and avoid relegation by a point on the last day, there will be at least one Tottenham fan who will genuinely appreciate Brendan Rodgers when he breaks into song.
'....this is the best trip...I've ever been oooooon...'
your point fits with those who prefer Rodgers over AVB, but im not one of them
I never said i wanted Rodgers, or Lambert, Martinez, Coyle or AVB etc. I feel they all have a lot more to prove before they could handle a job as big as Tottenham. Would Man U, Arse, City employ such inexperienced people? I doubt it. Chelsea have already had their fingers burnt, and i dont see why Spurs should take such a risk. Especially considering the level we are now at.
Get Mourinho in the summer and get in AVB as his assistant, sooooorted.
So you don't want AVB, and you don't want Lambert, Rodgers or Coyle. Admirable indeed. But I assume you also recognize that Guardiola and Mourinho might be a shade too ambitious for us, in which case you fall into the 'David Moyes' category. Am I right? I hope I'm not, because you seem like an erudite person ,and I cannot imagine how someone like that would prefer Moyes.
What makes Coyle "above" the Moyes category?
I dont think Jose is out of reach. People wanted Hiddink, Ancellotti etc.....are they THAT inferior to Guardiola or Jose?
Im personally warming to the likes of an unknown British manager, but there is also a massive risk of undoing alot of hard work. We need to think about attracting, and keeping top players now, and unfortunately, someone like AVB would still pull more attraction than Lambert in that sense. (I do not want AVB)
Id like Rijkaard, if Harry did leave