Can you imagine if Sherwood had managed a team who went 2 goals ahead at a helplessly out of form team only to go onto lose 3-2?? #justsaying!
Yeah and Liverpool threw away a 3-0 lead to draw against Palace. Shizzle happens.
Can you imagine if Sherwood had managed a team who went 2 goals ahead at a helplessly out of form team only to go onto lose 3-2?? #justsaying!
I'm not saying they've always kept faith with every manager - simply that they did with Rodgers.I disagree completely.
Did Liverpool give Hodgson time? Did Liverpool give Dalglish time? Did they ****.
Rodgers was kept after his first season after finishing 7th, the season before that they had finished 8th. AVB was kept after his first season after finishing 5th, the season before that we had finished 4th. How can that be seen as Liverpool keeping faith and giving time without also extending the same to us?
Nope the average tag was mine I think so you may tar me with that brush I like tar so unaffected
I stand by my thought that patch is average at the moment in my opinion
he may turn out amazing but again I will ask what has he done to warrant him getting the job at spurs ??
Just for the record I wanted martinez instead of avb it is very well documented just not on here
I would not have touched avb with a flag pole
I'm not saying they've always kept faith with every manager - simply that they did with Rodgers.
We don't with anyone. 9 managers in 13 years.
Yeah but hang on, there has to be clear signs of progress. Liverpool may have finished 7th that season under Rogers but their football took a definate turn for the better. After January particularly they started showing some fairly devastating form with Sturridge and Coutinho recruited.
You could see the improvement.
There were no signs of improvement under Dalglish or Hodgson and none under AVB for us.
If somethings worth being patient with then be patient if it doesnt look like its going anywhere then boot it!
If a manager, say Poch, had been in charge this season, finished in exactly the same league positiin and with the same points but:
1) played entertaining attacking, technical football whilst implementing a consistent tactical plan winning plaudits in the media
2) gave the top 4 a tough game and avoided the heavy defeats
Then i think the perception of the season would be completely different -"we sold bale and had to integrate 7 new players but weve looked good finished 6th and qualified for Europe just missing out on our record points tally" thats what a lot would be thinking.
I think a manager in that situation would get time.
AVB didnt get more time as nobody coukd see any signs of progress in our ability to attack and create and Sherwood didnt get time because there was no progress in our defensive farts and performance in big games and clear personality clashes that meant it was not going to work out
The difference with rodgers and martinez is that they both brought teams up from the Championship and kept them there whereas Poch has come in to the EPL and taken an avcerage team to an average position, his record at Espanyol before that was hardly exceptional. I would much sooner see an established manager come in rather than another "possible genius".
Pochettino's style is nothing like AVB's. Pochettino's teams press, but don't employ a high-line. The centre-backs do not get involved in the pressing so much and sit deep.
Also, AVB's teams, once they had possession, were told to be patient with the ball and wait for a safe opening, without taking risks.
Pochettino's teams look to go forward quickly in possession and look for the risky ball in the final 3rd a tonne more than AVB's teams.
I'm not saying they've always kept faith with every manager - simply that they did with Rodgers.
We don't with anyone. 9 managers in 13 years.
How do you do that when the opposition has 10 men behind the ball at all times and you have only one player who can unlock a defence (Eriksen) ?
AVB's Porto team were all high tempo counter attacking at pace. In Premier League he couldn't handle decent teams defending deep.
Pochettino has never experienced this. Who knows if he will be able to create a team that can unlock packed defences, he has no experience of it.
Barnett is supposed to be very good mates with Levy
passing up on FdB could end up being as bad as when we rejected the opportunity to bring in Suarez from Ajax....sliding door moments. Our other dealing with Ajax have been excellent, Eriksen and Vertonghen. Come on Levy, go Dutch!!!
Fair enough. It obviously isn't going to be 100% but I suspect there is quite a strong correlation between those who previously said no to the other 2 and those who are dead set against him now.
I'm not even strongly in favour of Poch by any means. I can't say I've watched all of their games or could write you a dossier on his 'vision' for how his teams should play. I do however know that when I did watch them, I was very impressed with their football. I was very impressed with the progress that quite a few of their players have made over the past 2 years. And I was very impressed with their league finishes.
A club of our standing needs to gamble for the most part with managerial appointments, unless someone obvious like LVG (and some will disagree) Benitez comes along. That means someone who may not be at the top now but has shown vision and the ability to get more out of his players than their ability might indicate.
Out of interest, what had Martinez done that you thought warranted him getting the job when AVB was hired?
'Was' mate...I will always wonder about how much that relationship changed the course of our club's recent history...because as we moved into June '13, Bale was staying...anyway...this one is (as some others have said) chairman v owner. It will be interesting who wins out, but as I said a couple of weeks ago, Pochettino is a good bet. I can only think Martinez ruled himself out after all, because there was truth there. Rafa Benitez makes sense on paper but I suspect there's a lot of 'touting about' and not much substance there. The Baldini factor is big remember, and one thing I thought about when Pochettino's name was first mentioned is how he's Argentinian, how Baldini believe in Lamela and how the two of them might work together to make him an absolute focus. Lallana's become one for Soton, and I see a project afoot to make Lamela the same. I think the boy is going to get some proper support from all places next season if these end up being the driving seat of the club for a while.
How do you do that when the opposition has 10 men behind the ball at all times and you have only one player who can unlock a defence (Eriksen) ?
AVB's Porto team were all high tempo counter attacking at pace. In Premier League he couldn't handle decent teams defending deep.
Pochettino has never experienced this. Who knows if he will be able to create a team that can unlock packed defences, he has no experience of it.
Ahhh thats a simple one to answer
I work with semi pro footballers and talk to coaches and managers every day and quite frankly they bore the living **** out of me
But when ever martinez talks football ,tactics ,style of play and philosophy I sit and listen its interesting.
he has a passion unlike few others and a great understanding of how football should be played and is a workaholic
in short like lvg and fdb I like him.
That is a very fair and well reasoned response in fairness.
Southampton to spurs is two entirely different scenarios
I'd be happy with Poch, but I still have a nagging feeling that FDB would be the one that got away. Then again if we get FDB I'll end up thinking that we may have made a mistake.
Too many negative posts make me wary of any new manager.