Chancer you said
> If you argue Pochetinno is a better choice as Spurs head coach in Summer 2014 ahead of Sherwood to complete his last 12 months, I will vehemently disagree with you.
You also said Sherwood has a better understanding of the squad and 6 months on Poch or any new manager. But isn't that somewhat short term to think he knows more about the squad now, and therefore is in a better position to take us forward next season. Whilst it might be true that it may take take the new man 6 months or more to learn more about his squad (let's call it another season of transition) we should be looking at this more long term.
I totally agree, which is why picking a manager in between the ideal candidate and Sherwood is such a mistake.
Ideal candidate = multi-season project we can all buy into. Money, faith, hope, trust. Balls to the wall support.
Sherwood = 12 month contact with the hope it'll go well, but limited damage if it doesn't (in terms of time wasted, money spent, squad upheaval, can be sacked if better comes along, we know there'll be no boardroom conflict because he's already worked with the board, no learning curve over summer etc.)
Guy in the middle = Erm, is this guy doing the multi-season project, balls-to-the-wall thing? Or...is he a glorified caretaker? Are we going to be kicking ourselves in 12 months when Klopp gets sacked and this guy still has 3 years left on his contract? Do we give him money and power over shaping the squad for perhaps years to come? Do we invest hope and emotion in him? Don't they always say players drop off when they know a manager is on the way out? Won't this guy always be teetering on that edge?
If you argue Pochettino is a better coach than Sherwood and the potential rewards are greater long term, then it should surely be a no brainer?
Poch being a better coach ≠ Better rewards long term.
Eg: he doesn't work out, he's sold Lamela, Carroll and Bentaleb, he's brought in X, Y, Z players on big money who don't work out, he's brought in a new army of assistants and drilled the players in a specific way that a new coach has to unteach them...Would that not do more long term harm than any amount of short-term benefit he might have brought? That level of risk requires a commensurate level of reward. "He might get us CL" doesn't cut it.
I like Poch a lot, but excuse me if I'm not nuts about handing the next several years of Spurs future to a 42 year old with 1 full season in the PL and an extremely hard to judge 2 seasons at Espanyol at the end of which he was sacked. I like the guy, I really do, but let's just cool the boots a bit.
........
Bar Poch, there's isn't a single other candidate I'm interested in (other than the obvious LvG/FdB type lads) so this debate for me is solely about Poch. Anyone mentions Mancini or Spaletti to me and the argument above is just multiplied by 100.