Harry_Perkins
Ben Thatcher
Speak for yourself, fella. I don't.
Sure, I would much prefer that City (and Chelsea, for that matter) had never won the lottery.
And, sure, I'd love Spurs to become a club that regularly wins the Premier League title and the Champions League without spending any unearned money.
But if, every time we get close to becoming a regular CL team, another club wins the lottery, outspends us by hundreds of millions and consequently overtakes us, then I'm very much of the opinion: if you can't beat 'em join 'em.
Let's not forget the real purpose of FFP. It had nothing to do with helping well run clubs like Spurs that reside, frustratingly, just outside the CL elite. It was introduced to preserve the status of the established CL clubs. The CL was their private gravy train. And they didn't want anyone else getting on. They just happened to be the ones in possession when the CL first started. And with the benefit of huge revenues from the CL, they were able virtually to corner the market in players, money, trophies and CL qualification - which helped to earn them more money, more trophies, more top players and more CL qualification. And so on ad infinitum.
All of that was threatened by the sudden emergence of clubs like Emirates Marketing Project, PSG and Malaga. So, all of a sudden, FFP became a priority. It was imperative that no other club should be allowed to have ideas above its station. Inequality was only okay, after all, if it favoured the established CL elite.
Yep, agree with this. FFP just entrenches the inequalities that have been building in the game for the last 25 years or so. You need to tackle the root of the problem, which starts with the skewed income distribution. And that doesn't just mean Champions League income. It means looking at TV money, gate receipts, sponsorship... everything.