• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

New New Manager Poll (The Lets Get It Right This Time Edition)

Who Do You Want Then?

  • Poch

    Votes: 58 43.3%

  • Gallardo

    Votes: 7 5.2%

  • De Zerbi

    Votes: 2 1.5%

  • Enrique

    Votes: 1 0.7%

  • Carrick

    Votes: 1 0.7%

  • Kompany

    Votes: 1 0.7%

  • Other

    Votes: 23 17.2%

  • Tuchel

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Nagelsmann

    Votes: 24 17.9%

  • Slot

    Votes: 17 12.7%
  • Total voters
    134
alekaras said:
Makes sense, but then the question is, where does he go? He's not leaving the PL and in the PL the only place he is guaranteed a league title and even a CL medal is City. But City don't need him any longer. Liverpool would not be interested or play the style that suits him. So that leaves United and Chelsea. If we get a good manager that turns us around fairly quickly, why would United or Chelsea be a better proposition than Spurs? So I do think that, if we really hit the jackpot with the new manager, it increases the likelihood Kane stays.
Click to expand...
He’ll go wherever he wants. Wherever that is he will earn just as much (and likely more) than he does at Spurs and have a bigger chance of winning things as the club he goes to will prioritise winning things over just trying to finish 4th.
 
Finney Is Back said:
He’ll go wherever he wants. Wherever that is he will earn just as much (and likely more) than he does at Spurs and have a bigger chance of winning things as the club he goes to will prioritise winning things over just trying to finish 4th.
Click to expand...
Don’t United have some salary cap now which is less than Kane currently earns??

tbh I think he is in a tough spot if we hold onto him, if he fancies a project/risk and to emulate Shearer maybe Saudi Sportswashing Machine is an option but otherwise leaves Chelsea really. City won’t be losing Haaland anytime soon and unless the intend to play Kane as AM he won’t be interested in the rotation there
 
Not speaking to Poch, if even just for PR and optics is one of the most baffling decisions of all time.

Easy enough to then say both parties had different ideas for the project, but to not get him in a room....
 
demotw said:
Why? Not everyone wants Poch back you know, I certainly don’t -
Click to expand...

Because logically he would be better than having Mason in charge, as much as I like Mason; Because logically he is the best fit for Spurs as he has already been successful in that position; Because it is utterly stupid not to even speak to him and just let one of our most hated rivals appoint him. Because the only available manager who could be better than him is Nagelsmann, but there are huge questions about his man management skills. Plus would Nagelsmann even come here, to the club that rarely enhances a manager's reputation? He is young and still building a name for himself.

demotw said:
He talks about being brave, without being specific and yet everyone assumes it’s about investing yet he clearly also stated many times he turned the chance to sign players down, those he did sign was more misses then hits
Click to expand...
When and where?
demotw said:
I get time can warp views, but look at the comments in his thread - no plan B, can’t break down teams who defend deep, etc etc..
Click to expand...
If anyone appointing was to take fans comments on tactics seriously then we would never appoint any manager. Lots of great managers don't have a plan B or their teams cannot break down teams who defend deep. We recently parted company with one.

Finally you appoint the best manager available it doesn't matter if you go back to one who was previously successful if they are potentially the right fit. He is the one manager we have appointed since the start of the PL era who consistently upset the odds and almost won us the biggest prizes in club football.
 
Last edited:
alekaras said:
Makes sense, but then the question is, where does he go? He's not leaving the PL and in the PL the only place he is guaranteed a league title and even a CL medal is City. But City don't need him any longer. Liverpool would not be interested or play the style that suits him. So that leaves United and Chelsea. If we get a good manager that turns us around fairly quickly, why would United or Chelsea be a better proposition than Spurs? So I do think that, if we really hit the jackpot with the new manager, it increases the likelihood Kane stays.
Click to expand...

I mean really? Do we still have to ask the question about why those clubs would be better options than spurs?
 
Bedfordspurs said:
United last season were a mess and going nowhere
Chelsea this season are worse off than us
Click to expand...
Utd are still largely a mess, winning the league cup and getting CL because everyone else is in an even bigger mess shouldn't hide that.
They will probably finish the league closer to villa and Brighton than they will to whoever finishes second.
Not to say that they won't improve next season of course.
 
Robspur12 said:
Because logically he would be better than having Mason in charge, as much as I like Mason; Because logically he is the best fit for Spurs as he has already been successful in that position; Because it is utterly stupid not to even speak to him and just let one of our most hated rivals appoint him. Because the only available manager who could be better than him is Nagelsmann, but there are huge questions about his man management skills. Plus would Nagelsmann even come here, to the club that rarely enhances a manager's reputation? He is young and still building a name for himself.
Click to expand...

I'd be curious to learn about the 'logic' in question. Your opinion is as valid as the next guy's but logic implies something that could be demonstrated or proven. Where's the proof? Each and every appointment is a gamble: nobody thought we'd play a CL final when Pochettino was appointed. Nobody thought Harry Redknapp would lead a Spurs side in the CL either. In my opinion, there's no logic in football: just odds, opinions and hindsight. But I'm not having a go and I'd be happy to be proved wrong if this wasn't a figure of speech.
 
glasgowspur said:
Utd are still largely a mess, winning the league cup and getting CL because everyone else is in an even bigger mess shouldn't hide that.
They will probably finish the league closer to villa and Brighton than they will to whoever finishes second.
Not to say that they won't improve next season of course.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure
Need another season to judge
 
Robspur12 said:
Because logically he would be better than having Mason in charge, as much as I like Mason; Because logically he is the best fit for Spurs as he has already been successful in that position; Because it is utterly stupid not to even speak to him and just let one of our most hated rivals appoint him. Because the only available manager who could be better than him is Nagelsmann, but there are huge questions about his man management skills. Plus would Nagelsmann even come here, to the club that rarely enhances a manager's reputation? He is young and still building a name for himself.


When and where?

If anyone appointing was to take fans comments on tactics seriously then we would never appoint any manager. Lots of great managers don't have a plan B or their teams cannot break down teams who defend deep. We recently parted company with one.

Finally you appoint the best manager available it doesn't matter if you go back to one who was previously successful if they are potentially the right fit. He is the one manager we have appointed since the start of the PL era who consistently upset the odds and almost won us the biggest prizes in club football.
Click to expand...

That's your opinion and your entitled to it. Mine is he struck it lucky with the players we already had were young, hungry and fit the style of play he wanted. The core was already here, when he tried to upgrade mostly he failed more then he succeeded - that's not to say Toby or Wanyama were not successes but can name plenty who were not. He is a good motivator, i think he used what he inherited very well and improved some of them too leading to our most succesful period in the PL but we are in a different time now, the core of the squad is not there, the average player age is much higher, Harry Kane can not press like he used to and we lack a creative spark that we had from Eriksen or the distribution capability from the like of Verts (wont mention Toby as that was his signing). Signing the right manager is not easy, we could sign Poch and end up 2pts from 8 games OR we could sign Slot for example and be top of the league after 8 games or any combination inbetween but what we absolutely have to do is sign someone who a) has a vision on how the club should move forward, b) can work with the players we have currently as we wont change the entire 1st team squad in one window and c) needs to be able instil confidence within the players, while still changing the mentality/culture of the club.
 
demotw said:
That's your opinion and your entitled to it. Mine is he struck it lucky with the players we already had were young, hungry and fit the style of play he wanted. The core was already here, when he tried to upgrade mostly he failed more then he succeeded - that's not to say Toby or Wanyama were not successes but can name plenty who were not. He is a good motivator, i think he used what he inherited very well and improved some of them too leading to our most succesful period in the PL but we are in a different time now, the core of the squad is not there, the average player age is much higher, Harry Kane can not press like he used to and we lack a creative spark that we had from Eriksen or the distribution capability from the like of Verts (wont mention Toby as that was his signing). Signing the right manager is not easy, we could sign Poch and end up 2pts from 8 games OR we could sign Slot for example and be top of the league after 8 games or any combination inbetween but what we absolutely have to do is sign someone who a) has a vision on how the club should move forward, b) can work with the players we have currently as we wont change the entire 1st team squad in one window and c) needs to be able instil confidence within the players, while still changing the mentality/culture of the club.
Click to expand...

Well we're likely to be going down the young & hungry player route again (if we can get our transfers right) so there's one tick. Proven in the Prem there's another, we likely need to clear out some established players and build a new team, another tick. We need/want to play attacking/entertaining football, We need vision, we need to work with the players here, we need to instill confidence tick tick tick. But hey in 5 years he made a few decisions that proved to be wrong/were questionable show me a manager who hasn't over the same time frame (hell i see more questionable decisions made in a far shorter timeframe from each of his successors) so is that really enough to write off 5 years of good results/performance?
 
Looks like chelsea will get him so Poch is out of the running. But from what I’ve read in the comments, Levy didn’t even put him in the running
 
Jurgen the German said:
We have a chairman who doesn’t know what he’s doing, no DOF and no manager. If someone said we’re a better option than Everton I would agree but not United or Chelsea. Nothing will change whilst levy is in charge.
Click to expand...
And Chelsea and united are different how?

One has a chairman that thinks he is a the coach
The other has chairmen who are pretending to sell the club to keep the fans off their back
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back