-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
New Kit?
- Thread starter THFC6061
- Start date
thfcsteff
Garth Crooks
Ahem, been saying this for a while (a guess) Nike Hart Lane!
edit: just saw Milo's post from yesterday, but in fairness, I've giggled about this name twist for some time.
Last edited:
philspursuk
Sean Davis
Modric THFC
Jimmy McCormick
Cheap knock off kit in Thailand.
Our 16/17 will have the new Premier League logo on it.
The sponsor wont be a different position on the home and away kits.
afsoc4life
Dean Richards
That is scary. Holds sash jersey to self (and I thought this was bad)!!
Millsy_Yiddo
Naybet
Yeh, bit disappointed that they didn't go the retro/traditional route with the last kit we will wear at White Hart Lane. I suppose with how easy it is to make a cheap knock off of a plain white kit they want to avoid it, but I'd love to see a more modern version of the double winning kit with the current badge or something like that.
Still hoping the one above isn't the kit. Then again most of the UA kits seem to grow on me.
Still hoping the one above isn't the kit. Then again most of the UA kits seem to grow on me.
Glenda's Legs
Paul Walsh
From Grey Fox on SC yesterday :
As far as the Nike deal goes there are a number of issues with some of our players having lucrative deals with other makers e.g. Alli has a deal from Addidas on the table which could be worth more to him than we pay him in wages. So, although still probable its not as straight forward as some are reporting.
That must be a relatively normal situation though mustn't it? i.e. star players having sponsorship deals that differ from their club's kit sponsors?
As far as the Nike deal goes there are a number of issues with some of our players having lucrative deals with other makers e.g. Alli has a deal from Addidas on the table which could be worth more to him than we pay him in wages. So, although still probable its not as straight forward as some are reporting.
That must be a relatively normal situation though mustn't it? i.e. star players having sponsorship deals that differ from their club's kit sponsors?
Dr Rosenrosen
Ramon Vega
Of course. That's gonads.
mjc23
Terry Fenwick
What a load of bollox! I'm sure Adidas sponsoring Real Madrid with Ronaldo being sponsored by Nike didn't cause them any sleepless nights.
Dr Rosenrosen
Ramon Vega
In the States (where league rules dictate that all teams' kits must be, um, uniform), Nike supply uniforms for ALL of the NFL teams under a deal with the league itself, and have a deal with the NBA as well starting in 2017.
Craig_J
Mido
Neither did Barca being sponsored by Nike with Messi being sponsored by Adidas
No way it would cause any problems.
I think they The Grey Fox may have read about United having problems with Mourinho's car and sponsorship deals and decided he might as well apply it to our kit situation for an easy, bogus ITK story.
parklane1
Tony Galvin
Indeed.
mjc23
Terry Fenwick
Yea but players have whatever shoe details they like regardless of league kit manufacturer.
Dr Rosenrosen
Ramon Vega
Exactly. That was the point I was trying to make.
