Depends on his fitness Anand injury issues. Not easy to sell a 30+ player with ongoing injury problems when he's on £100k p/w or more.Call BS on that ...
We don't do short contracts, and we could easily sell Dembele in 2-3 years if he started to fade.
Depends on his fitness Anand injury issues. Not easy to sell a 30+ player with ongoing injury problems when he's on £100k p/w or more.
A 3 year deal would be a risk. It will depend on how the club sees his injury issues at the moment. If we think there's a good likelihood he's gotten past them I don't think a longer contract will be much of an issue.
If there's a real risk of us paying £10-15m to a player to sit around being injured or unfit most of the time when we could have sold him for £20-25m we could be more cautious. That's a lot of money.
I agree that it's a two way street. But it shouldn't be seen as an either or kind of thing. I have no problems with us rewarding some players for their loyalty, up to a point. Not sure Dembele has been all that loyal, or its just that he's found his level with us. I don't think he's rejected a big money move from a huge club. But he's been a loyal enough player for us putting in a lot of work over years. Being rewarded for that with a bit more money over a 2-3 year contract seems fine. Being rewarded for that with a £100k p/w 3-4 year deal seems like stretching it to me.Not criticising your post at all, but it has reminded me that it’s funny how fans criticise players for a lack of loyalty, but show virtually no loyalty themselves. Can’t blame players for only looking out for number one when fans and clubs do exactly the same.
He's handling the 90 mins fairly regularly now. Maybe his injury issues are behind him since that operation at the start of the season. If so he is worth the 100k.
His new contract will be a tough one for us to negotiate given he’s missed around a quarter of the games most seasons with injury but he’s a unique player...wages would have to be appearance based but doped clubs will be happy to pay him a lot more for only playing 3/4 of the games given their deeper squads / unreal budgets anyway!!I agree, but with daft buggers like PSG and City around, a single phone call can turn this into a Tobyone scenario.
His new contract will be a tough one for us to negotiate given he’s missed around a quarter of the games most seasons with injury but he’s a unique player...wages would have to be appearance based but doped clubs will be happy to pay him a lot more for only playing 3/4 of the games given their deeper squads / unreal budgets anyway!!
It’s not about us being paupers it’s more about us still being a business compared to some of the other members of that top 10.We're not a pauper club any more, we're likely to break into the top 10 clubs worldwide soon for both revenue and wages.
Dembele is so important to us and as long as his wage demands aren't insane, we should be looking to meet them. They certainly shouldn't be appearance based!
It’s not about us being paupers it’s more about us still being a business compared to some of the other members of that top 10.
I guess it depends on the levels of insanity and I’d love him to stay on a purely player level, but if he gets an insane offer of treble what he’s on now then it would be harder to make a case for him topping or busting our new wage structure given the number of appearances we are likely to get from him.
It’s a little nerve wracking to think that post the new stadium we will have so many deals to negotiate, our reasonable flat structure will start to have a much bigger disparity and there will be a couple of regular first team players who won’t be part of that initial elite group for one reason or another.
To be honest, I don't mind that.
Obviously these statistics can never be fully accurate but allegedly at Atletico, Costa, Griezsmann, Koke and Godin all earn significantly more than the rest of the squad. Koke and Griezsmann are quite a way ahead of the other 2 as well. This makes sense to me as despite the fact Atletico are an incredible team, who rely so much on the system etc, there are players there in that squad who are clearly far more important than others.
So to be honest, I have no problem with the likes of Kane and Eriksen (for instance) being far out of the others when it comes to wages. As I think they're our two most important players.
Would definitely agree with a similar structure of pay with the key players earning a higher a wage for their contribution - I think with the right players it would create a sense of competition. I think we have seen at Arsenal the faults with paying the players rather evenly across the board.To be honest, I don't mind that.
Obviously these statistics can never be fully accurate but allegedly at Atletico, Costa, Griezsmann, Koke and Godin all earn significantly more than the rest of the squad. Koke and Griezsmann are quite a way ahead of the other 2 as well. This makes sense to me as despite the fact Atletico are an incredible team, who rely so much on the system etc, there are players there in that squad who are clearly far more important than others.
So to be honest, I have no problem with the likes of Kane and Eriksen (for instance) being far out of the others when it comes to wages. As I think they're our two most important players.
Yep a tiered approach seems logical and obvious. I would definitely put Dembele in the band of players behind Kane (who should be at the top on his own IMO). Whatever package they put together might be related to appearances, but I certainly would put him in with about 4-5 other players that should be paid as well as the club can afford as we will find very difficult to replace them with similar quality if they leave.Would definitely agree with a similar structure of pay with the key players earning a higher a wage for their contribution - I think with the right players it would create a sense of competition. I think we have seen at Arsenal the faults with paying the players rather evenly across the board.
His new contract will be a tough one for us to negotiate given he’s missed around a quarter of the games most seasons with injury but he’s a unique player...wages would have to be appearance based but doped clubs will be happy to pay him a lot more for only playing 3/4 of the games given their deeper squads / unreal budgets anyway!!