Yep Ings, Maddison, Iheanacho and Mitrovic. CL quality players if I've ever seen them... I mean seriously?! This is getting absolutely absurd.
Yep Ings, Maddison, Iheanacho and Mitrovic. CL quality players if I've ever seen them... I mean seriously?! This is getting absolutely absurd.
Talk about read one thing and quote another.
Please point out in my post where I said those players are Champions League quality.
You’ve completely missed the point of my post. I threw some forwards names around to highlight that there are options out there who could possibly take some minutes off Kane in less important games. So far Poch doesn’t seem to want to give any minutes to the current back ups.
Maddison I mentioned as someone who could do the same for Eriksen.
I don’t have a handle on the whole of Europe as it’s not my job, but I’m sure there are plenty more out there.
We’ve got better players without squad numbers already.
What you're asserting is that we should have signed players, any players because that's what transfer windows are for.
Only the players that you mention would not have strengthened our squad and would not have been used by Poch. Period.
You also claim that Poch isn't rotating the squad, that's absolute nonsense too. He's been rotating regularly so far, the season is still in its infancy too.
The likes of GKN and Sissoko may have fallen out of favour, but Winks, Aurier, Rose, Lamela, Moura etc have all been given opportunities now.
With Son back and Wanyama returning to the fray from injury, our depth will be fine once the squad has had a chance to settle properly.
Simply names I threw around to highlight the back up issue to Kane. Point being there can’t be no players out there that are better than the current back up, and surely an improvement would make Pochs job easier as he could give whoever it may be some minutes here or there.
At no point did I suggest those players are CL quality.
Why is Mitrovic et al that much better than Janssen or Llorente at being Kane's back up?
Maddison wanted to be playing every week, not getting 30 mins hear and there and hoping to be rotated in behind one of our best players. More young players are wise to the idea that it's important to play first 11 football now. And these are reasons why it was difficult to improve us.
Lamela is a good player. Aurier tonight showed he was a good player. Winks is coming back to form. Wanyama hopefully will. In a month's time, our squad will look deeper again.
It's funny that every time someone says 'I'm not an expert on European football so I don't know everyone, but those were just examples. We should have signed someone' they are never actually able to say who.
We have pretty good back ups in all positions. Rose, Aurier, Sanchez, Wanyama, Winks, Sissoko, Lamela, Moura. Those are all players, when fully fit, I would be very comfortable seeing in our first choice 11 and I'd be confident they would do a good job. Vorm, Foyth, KWP, GKN and Llorente are squad filler, but they were bought to be back ups and that's what they are right now. Maybe we can get someone better than Llorente, who was someone we hoped would be better than Janssen, but without regular time I don't think any player that is almost certainly better than Llorente wants to come here.
A signing here or there, whether first 11 or back up, is not going to put us on another level. Operating on a different financial level would, and that's when the game will change. That's where we need to get to. All of this back and forth around a lack of signings really is pointless. We will be roughly where we always were come the end of the season. In the top 6, maybe 4th if we get it together.
I think the above proves my point.
We’ve just finished 3 2 3 and with a couple of subtle additions and a marquee signing I think we’d have been set for similar.
As it is you suggest we are looking at top 6 - maybe 4th.
Ps - I agree re: having good back up in most places - hence wholesale not needed.
It's funny that every time someone says 'I'm not an expert on European football so I don't know everyone, but those were just examples. We should have signed someone' they are never actually able to say who.
We have pretty good back ups in all positions. Rose, Aurier, Sanchez, Wanyama, Winks, Sissoko, Lamela, Moura. Those are all players, when fully fit, I would be very comfortable seeing in our first choice 11 and I'd be confident they would do a good job. Vorm, Foyth, KWP, GKN and Llorente are squad filler, but they were bought to be back ups and that's what they are right now. Maybe we can get someone better than Llorente, who was someone we hoped would be better than Janssen, but without regular time I don't think any player that is almost certainly better than Llorente wants to come here.
A signing here or there, whether first 11 or back up, is not going to put us on another level. Operating on a different financial level would, and that's when the game will change. That's where we need to get to. All of this back and forth around a lack of signings really is pointless. We will be roughly where we always were come the end of the season. In the top 6, maybe 4th if we get it together.
We've had this discussion before though. It isn't funny at all, it is in fact fantastical to claim that there are no players in Europe who we could have signed who could have improved us.
I have given multiple examples in the past of players we ourselves have signed that most of our fan base would not necessarily have known or even given as examples of players we should be chasing. I'm sure most Spurs fans wouldn't have said, we need to get Dele, Dier. Trippier from relegated Burnley will be good. Wanyama and Alderweireld were not immediately accepted as good choices by many of our fans, who didn't see the big fuss. That 16 year old left winger from Leeds we signed for 1 million and ended up becoming our lb probably wasn't at the top of many lists either. Probably most of our squad is like this actually.
I don't know why you think it is the job of the fan at home to provide lists of players from across Europe who we could have signed. That isn't their job. They are not paid to do that.
I don't have to be an expert on international trade agreements or negotiation to recognise that Theresa May is doing a brick job with Brexit. And I don't need to lay out my own personal manifesto to be able to say that she should be doing a better job.
I have a bit of a problem with this tbh. I've said from a while ago that I think the stadium has become bigger and bigger in peoples' minds since its inception. It will allow us to compete with the Manchester clubs, the Reals and Barcelonas. Realistically, it won't though. Financially, the commercial deals are the ones that make the big money now (and the TV money in the UK for everyone). The stadium will help bridge a gap, perhaps bring us closer to Liverpool and Arsenal but the others are a distant prospect.
I'm also concerned about naming rights deals, commercial deals, player retention and crowds if we end up back in the EL next season. Things are not always linear in football.
I don’t think the stadium in and of itself will help us compete with Manchester and Barca. I do think it will bring us closer to Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal and make us a more attractive acquisition target for a bigger owner than ENIC to take us on the next part of the journey.
As for signings, think where we are now vs where we were when those players were signed. Where a Dier could come in and be an improvement, but also have the room to fail. The bulk of this squad is coming to the end of its time together, but this wasn’t the summer we could shift them out and make the space we needed. So we still have Toby etc. The room for definite improvement, in line with our financial constraints, is very small. Given how long it takes for new signings to settle into Poch’s way, I can see why it was judged that we stick rather than twist and wait until next summer.
We have good back ups across a variety of positions. I know who the obvious sales were, I’m just not sure who the definite improvements were. There’s a whole world of footballers out there but we’re the awkward spot of being a top 4 club with top 6 finances trying to become a consistent top 2 team. Not easy.
Why does it take so long to get new players going under Poch? Liverpool have them off and running quite immediately.
And why are we not bleeding more youngsters this season, when we didnt reinforce and are said to have a fantastic academy...
I know some things are out of Poch's hands but i think that theres more that he can do.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Fapatalk
Agree whole heartedly, this whole it’s so tough to improve on what we have is absolute nonsense and just some Spurs fans over rating our players. Kane, Eriksen, Jan and Toby if mentally right and Lloris are the only ones that we realistically would struggle to replace. There are better out there in other positions, whether they are gettable or not is a different question but let’s not claim our squad is so good it is that hard to upgrade. It really isn’t....We've had this discussion before though. It isn't funny at all, it is in fact fantastical to claim that there are no players in Europe who we could have signed who could have improved us.
I have given multiple examples in the past of players we ourselves have signed that most of our fan base would not necessarily have known or even given as examples of players we should be chasing. I'm sure most Spurs fans wouldn't have said, we need to get Dele, Dier. Trippier from relegated Burnley will be good. Wanyama and Alderweireld were not immediately accepted as good choices by many of our fans, who didn't see the big fuss. That 16 year old left winger from Leeds we signed for 1 million and ended up becoming our lb probably wasn't at the top of many lists either. Probably most of our squad is like this actually.
I don't know why you think it is the job of the fan at home to provide lists of players from across Europe who we could have signed. That isn't their job. They are not paid to do that.
I don't have to be an expert on international trade agreements or negotiation to recognise that Theresa May is doing a brick job with Brexit. And I don't need to lay out my own personal manifesto to be able to say that she should be doing a better job.
I have a bit of a problem with this tbh. I've said from a while ago that I think the stadium has become bigger and bigger in peoples' minds since its inception. It will allow us to compete with the Manchester clubs, the Reals and Barcelonas. Realistically, it won't though. Financially, the commercial deals are the ones that make the big money now (and the TV money in the UK for everyone). The stadium will help bridge a gap, perhaps bring us closer to Liverpool and Arsenal but the others are a distant prospect.
I'm also concerned about naming rights deals, commercial deals, player retention and crowds if we end up back in the EL next season. Things are not always linear in football.
We can sit here and claim that we are improving but we do the same things we done 2 years ago. The team is not a young team anymore and alot of these players are experienced in playing in world cups and champions leagues.
No use if the players don't learn anything from the experience, though. And I really don't think they have, since, as you mentioned, they're doing the exact same things they were doing two years ago - or even four years ago.