ricky2tricky4city
Steffen Freund
I think signing Eriksen makes sense, for the 352 option, or he could equally play off the left if Sonny isn't there. I'd also be happy for him to take up one of the double pivot spots in games we are likely to control.I took the strange approach because I'm not really seeing a bunch of threads arguing to upgrade Sanchez, Rodon or even Gollini (is Forster even an upgrade there? or just HG), and while you feel that's less of a worry, I'm not sure I want to see 10 games of Rodon/Sanchez.
I totally get some people don't rate Lucas and I haven't tried to argue that or change anyone's mind.
Your first point is the interesting piece because I don't think if Kulu gets injured next season we play Lucas for 10+ games. I think we will strengthen the midfield (Eriksen maybe?) and if we get an injury to Son/Kulu, we will revert to Conte's most used formation of 3-5-2 and just play 2 up front (hence why again, I just don't see Lucas as priority). No issue conceptually with selling both to get a versatile forward that could play across the line, I do think we are already short numerically, so not sure it is the best result.
Maybe we can be ok numerically with some flexible players. Eriksen Perisic Kulu and one other to add to Sonny and Kane. Sess could play in Sonny's place if we are stretched.
Quality wise, the difference this season is midweeks could be tougher with CL ties and it then depends on how Conte views that. Will the league still be priority? ....so numerically (especially with 5 subs as well) like you say we need to get it right.
Fwiw I think Lucas will be staying anyway