• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Levy's Plan

Baleforce said:
If the past isn’t relevant, what exactly is Levy being judged as a failure against?
Click to expand...
The past isn't irrelevant, but top 4 as a goal wasn't relevant before 99.
billyiddo said:
Why is top half finishes any more palatable/less arbitary than top 4?
Click to expand...
Because why top 4? We know why and as I keep saying that's only relevant post 99. If we are going to talk about the past, then let's use the indicators that were valued and relevant back then. Top half was valued, top 2 was valued top 4? Nope.
 
Bishop said:
The past isn't irrelevant, but top 4 as a goal wasn't relevant before 99.

Because why top 4? We know why and as I keep saying that's only relevant post 99. If we are going to talk about the past, then let's use the indicators that were valued and relevant back then. Top half was valued, top 2 was valued top 4? Nope.
Click to expand...

Top 2 data from being in the top league would be interesting, probably not since the 60s had we off my head??
 
Bishop said:
The past isn't irrelevant, but top 4 as a goal wasn't relevant before 99.

Because why top 4? We know why and as I keep saying that's only relevant post 99. If we are going to talk about the past, then let's use the indicators that were valued and relevant back then. Top half was valued, top 2 was valued top 4? Nope.
Click to expand...

Top half was valued but finishing higher within that and therefore being better wasn't? Not sure i see the logic.
 
billyiddo said:
Top half was valued but finishing higher within that and therefore being better wasn't? Not sure i see the logic.
Click to expand...
Finishing as high up the table was the aim. But if someone were to separate out finishing places, top 4 would not have been where they drew the line. Top 3 might have been the line but more likely it would have been top 2 or top half period.
 
Bishop said:
Finishing as high up the table was the aim. But if someone were to separate out finishing places, top 4 would not have been where they drew the line. Top 3 might have been the line but more likely it would have been top 2 or top half period.
Click to expand...
So?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back