milo
Jack L. Jones
Would probably spend the bulk of it on resigning Mason and Bentaleb
There'd be more than a touch of the Redknapps about GB the manager
Would probably spend the bulk of it on resigning Mason and Bentaleb
I'd like to see him actually improve a player whose raw. Someone like Sterling who still doesn't appear to have much a brain despite clearly having abolity. Make him into a consistent quality player would be good to see
That would be something credible.
To date he has inherited very strong squads of players and been at the richest sides so like Mou we have only seen a limited side to their management. You can't argue with the trophy haul though
Would probably spend the bulk of it on resigning Mason and Bentaleb
Obviously it not the same as winning as a professional but my three cup winning medals were more enjoyable to me than the 12 league winners I got. Even at park level it's a big thing.
there's more than one way to manage a football team, there are different skills you can use, different ways to take a club forward
every manager has players they succeed with and players they fail with
Well for Barca Guardiola is credited with formalising their defensive strategy.Isn't that Biesla's baby as opposed to Guardiola's?
And that only bidder was prepared to pay a world record fee as well.If Poch has made it known that Walker is not part of his plans, for whatever reason, and the only side interested in signing him was Emirates Marketing Project - what would you have done?
So basically our last 2 title bashes in the last 2 seasons were misguided?I disagree. If we pursue league titles, fall flat on our bottoms and end up empty-handed with naught but 3rd/4th places and runners-up finishes to show for it, it will have been the greatest waste of potential in this club's history. Winning cups will mitigate that possibility, and show players that we can give them medals too - for many players, that will be a step up from *no medals*, which is our present state. The league title can come later. Winning things *now* to forestall being pressed for moves by players using the 'I want to win things' excuse (as Walker has just done in his first City interview) is, imo, more important.
Absolutely, everyone treats Poch like a GHod on here but would he be as good with a blank cheque book? I'm not so sure. His methods are better suited to young impressionable players, managing a few superstars could really cause him problems....there's more than one way to manage a football team, there are different skills you can use, different ways to take a club forward
every manager has players they succeed with and players they fail with
Its a slant on any professional athlete to suggest winning things isn't important to them. At City he is more likely to achieve that whether we like it or not. I'm sure I'll get told I'm talking nonsense but if I had to put on a bet about who was more likely to win trophies I'd pick City ahead of Spurs for both PL and FA cup....So basically our last 2 title bashes in the last 2 seasons were misguided?
If Poch had won that league cup final v chelsea, walker could well still be here?
Walker in 'I want to win things with City' interview shocker.
I hope if we sign you, your interview would be ' I'm really hoping we don't go for the league, but what would make me happy is a efl cup or fa cup winners medal so when a world record bid and a 220,000 + wages offer comes in I can hold that medal up and say, no chance'
Its a slant on any professional athlete to suggest winning things isn't important to them. At City he is more likely to achieve that whether we like it or not. I'm sure I'll get told I'm talking nonsense but if I had to put on a bet about who was more likely to win trophies I'd pick City ahead of Spurs for both PL and FA cup....
Money is a massive part of football though. The big spenders tend to win the most prizes. They leave for both, the money and success. At Spurs you definitely don't get the money, and you're not even sure if going to win any trophies. At City you're getting a massive pay hike, and pretty much guaranteed a trophy every 2-3 years I'd say....They are but that's because they can pay the money to attract players away from clubs like us - if money was taken out of the equation then I'd say on paper our set of players are as good if not better than what City have (as of last season) and so we had as much chance of winning things over the next few years as City do - so why would you jump ship from a team as good as ours were it not for the pay rise?
Money is a massive part of football though. The big spenders tend to win the most prizes. They leave for both, the money and success. At Spurs you definitely don't get the money, and you're not even sure if going to win any trophies. At City you're getting a massive pay hike, and pretty much guaranteed a trophy every 2-3 years I'd say....
Yeah I agree, CAPABLE of winning trophies but we have nothing to back that up with right now. Poch has won nothing, we are classic nearly men and players have a short career. Walker is in his prime and can't afford to gamble with our potential vs City who are virtually guaranteed at least a couple of trophies during his next few years here. We really do need to win something if not this season then next, otherwise I fear for Dele and Kane leaving....See me edited post above mate - you're saying professional athletes want to win trophies, which of course is true but we have a team capable of winning trophies over the next few years but that isnt enough to keep them here if they can earn more money elsewhere...
Hopefully the contract situation for the majority of them means we can keep them together till a time when we have a revenue high enough to close the wage gap sufficiently
Yeah I agree, CAPABLE of winning trophies but we have nothing to back that up with right now. Poch has won nothing, we are classic nearly men and players have a short career. Walker is in his prime and can't afford to gamble with our potential vs City who are virtually guaranteed at least a couple of trophies during his next few years here. We really do need to win something if not this season then next, otherwise I fear for Dele and Kane leaving....
Just can't agree that we're as likely to win things on paper. Their attack is ridiculous, their only weak point was their defence and they are about to massively strengthen that department with two top full backs. They will likely get a top CB and even if they don't they will have Kompany back and I think Stones will be a lot stronger this season. Their manager has pedigree, last season was a big learning curve for him but he is an intelligent coach and it takes a while for his style to be implemented properly. We are playing at Wembley which will most likely hamper us, if we get top 4 this season we've done well.....On paper we're as likely to win trophies as City are though if you go by the current teams and their respective set ups - It's the money which means they are more likely to improve in the future because players will leave better teams to play for them - as I said catch 22
Just can't agree that we're as likely to win things on paper. Their attack is ridiculous, their only weak point was their defence and they are about to massively strengthen that department with two top full backs. They will likely get a top CB and even if they don't they will have Kompany back and I think Stones will be a lot stronger this season. Their manager has pedigree, last season was a big learning curve for him but he is an intelligent coach and it takes a while for his style to be implemented properly. We are playing at Wembley which will most likely hamper us, if we get top 4 this season we've done well.....
Absolutely, everyone treats Poch like a GHod on here but would he be as good with a blank cheque book? I'm not so sure. His methods are better suited to young impressionable players, managing a few superstars could really cause him problems....
It's just too easy to say players just go there for the money, or anywhere for that matter. As I already said the biggest and most successful clubs pay the biggest wages. Players would pick City ahead of us not just because of the money. You ask a foreign player who's the more successful club - they'd say City. They've consistently been in CL in recent years, won the FA Cup in recent years, have top European players in their team vs us who have won nothing in recent years and don't have renowned players. It's a bit fanciful to suggest City could only attract players ahead of us because of money, although yes obviously that helps....Well in reakity we aren't as likely to but that is because of the money - which is the point I'm trying to hammer home. Two seasons running we have been much the better side than them and there would be no reason to expect that to change were the teams invested in equally over the coming years - but because players put money above all else then the talent will gravitate towards City and potentially away from us.