You are ignoring the base of players we already had at the club. Consequently, comparisons with rivals are pretty meaningless unless you also factor in this vital ingredient.
I addressed that directly, he took over a squad of players that had finished 5th and 6th in their previous 2 seasons. That's the base level of players that were already at the club, we then spent less money than all of the teams we were competing with, both in regards to net spend and overall spend (as well as wages) and improved.
Do you have any comment to make in light of the figures i posted in my previous post regarding our spend in the market of 400m over 6 seasons or 300m over 5 and how that supposedly constitutes backing by the club when our rivals were spending much much more? Otherwise i don't really see much point in taking the time to respond to posts of yours if you're just going to ignore what i post
Last edited: