markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
And then Qatar Sports Investments, the owners of PSG, employed Platini's son as a lawyer dealing with their European investments.
it all stinks doesnt it...
And then Qatar Sports Investments, the owners of PSG, employed Platini's son as a lawyer dealing with their European investments.
Michel Platini, one of the most powerful men in world football, was on Monday night under pressure to explain a secret meeting with the man at the centre of the Qatar World Cup scandal.
The Telegraph has unearthed evidence that Mr Platini, a former leading French international and the president of Uefa, European football’s governing body, had a private discussion with Mohamed Bin Hammam, the controversial Qatari who paid millions of pounds to football officials around the world.
The emergence of the meeting means that France has become the first European nation to be drawn into the World Cup bribery scandal, which has so far been limited to African and Caribbean countries.
It is understood that the meeting took place shortly before Fifa awarded the 2022 World Cup to Qatar, and that Mr Bin Hammam personally lobbied Mr Platini to support the Emirate’s bid.
... Documents leaked to The Telegraph show that Mr Platini met Mr Bin Hammam for breakfast shortly before the former footballer met Nicolas Sarkozy, at the time the French president, the son of the emir of Qatar and the country’s prime minister for lunch at the Elysée Palace in November 2010, a month before the World Cup vote.
The following year, the state-owned Qatar Sports Investments bought Paris Saint-Germain, Mr Sarkozy’s favourite team. Mr Platini has always denied that Mr Sarkozy asked him to vote for Qatar, but in an interview he said: “I was invited to a dinner with Mr Sarkozy where there was the prime minister of Qatar. They never asked me during the dinner to vote. It was a clear thing about 'support’. They knew I would be independent.”
Mr Platini’s son Laurent became the chief executive of Burrda, a Qatar owned sports company. He has always said that his son’s role was unconnected to his vote.
it all stinks doesnt it...
How did UEFA deal with PSG with regards FFP?
Isn't there a conflict of interests brewing with Platini and his boy and pSg
You have to admire the bare faced cheek of the man. He's corrupt to the core. We know it, he knows it, he knows we know it but he doesn't give a ****. He would have made a great politician.
About bloody time ... Maybe this will increase the pressure.
http://www.news.com.au/finance/busi...ar-world-cup-bid/story-fnda1bsz-1226949359611
MAJOR sponsors Adidas, Sony and Visa have demanded that FIFA carry out a thorough investigation of corruption allegations over Qatar's 2022 World Cup-bid, stepping up pressure on football's governing body.
The corporate titans urged football's rulers to probe claims that former Qatari football boss Mohamed bin Hammam paid millions of dollars in bribes to secure support for a deeply controversial victory in a 2010 FIFA vote.
The three companies account for hundreds of millions of dollars of sponsorship for FIFA. They are three of the six top level sponsors of the World Cup.
Adidas said in a statement that it was “confident that the matter is being dealt with as a priority”.
FIFA investigator Michael Garcia, a former US federal prosecutor, is to finish his inquiry into the 2018 and 2022 World Cup votes on Tuesday.
The company said it has had a “long-term and successful partnership with FIFA” that it looked forward to continuing. “Having said that, the negative tenor of the public debate around FIFA at the moment is neither good for football nor for FIFA and its partners,” Adidas said.
Sony was reported by The Sunday Times as saying that it wanted FIFA to hold an “appropriate” investigation into the Qatar allegations.
“As a FIFA partner, we expect these allegations to be investigated appropriately,” the Japanese electronics giant told the paper.
“We continue to expect FIFA to adhere to its principles of integrity, ethics and fair play across all aspects of its operations.” Visa was equally outspoken.
“Visa does not take part in the administration of sport,” said a statement released by the credit card giant.
“Our expectation remains that all of our partners maintain strong ethical standards and operate with transparency.” Qatar has strongly denied allegations reported by The Sunday Times newspaper that former Qatar football boss Mohamed Bin Hammam paid more than $US5 million ($A5.41 million) in bribes to win support ahead of the 2010 vote on the 2018 and 2022 hosts of the World Cup.
FIFA investigator Garcia has said he will conclude his inquiry by June 9, but is not expected to submit his final report until mid-July.
The tiny Gulf state prevailed over the US, Australia, Japan and South Korea, despite a FIFA technical report which warned the searing temperatures during June and July posed a health risk.
[tweet]476411549423509504[/tweet]
The big question that all the journalists seem to be missing is "why is FIFA even relevant?"
It is a massively corrupt organization, that is not in line with what most countries want, does not embrace positive change to the game, we don't really need anyone to tell us the rules any more.
Why don't the major football nations just decide FIFA is no longer relevant, and appoint a paid/audited 3rd party with transparency and a set of goals around the future of the game
For the national teams the majority of their income comes from the World Cup, Euros and associated qualifiers. FIFA and UEFA have the right to those competitions and thus holds the key to the money. Of course new tournaments could be formed, but it would have to be a mass exodus from under FIFA's wings that would have to be well organized and planned to keep national organizations going. Those national organizations have strong ties with FIFA/UEFA because of the delegates etc. Organizing a large scale switch to a new organization is probably therefor almost impossible. On the other hand individual or small groups of nations even starting talks about forming a new organization would probably face exclusions and the financial problems that would entail.
I'm not sure, but as a part of player contracts/league membership are clauses that clubs must release players for official national team games. I'm guessing this is only official as in FIFA/UEFA organized. Jumping ship could open up a massive can of worms for the national teams over payment to players, insurance etc.
As 6061 said, they have a lot of power, way beyond just being the ideal 3rd party you describe. That power keeps them in charge and I doubt we'll see a change to that.