Got to admit that I'm a bit taken back by the negativity towards Hugo. Yes he has his not-so-good moments, but more than makes up for it in what he does well. I'm pretty sure that he's a net positive, faults and all, and still one of the best keepers we could hope to get. Harry Kane squanders more than one chance a game either by scuffing it or by not passing when he should but few would argue that the sum of his contribution is very positive indeed. Of course we should look to replace with his age in mind, but there are more urgent positions to fix in our somewhat disjointed squad than Hugo, if you ask me.