Not a penny and no doubt Poch will get the boot when things turn sour in february march time.
We don't need to spend money.
We've got a bloated squad and ideally would end the window 5 or 6 players down (thereby generating a significant surplus, even if we do sign two or even three £10m+ players).
Also remember 9 of our 10 most expensive signings have been relative flops. Only Modric defies the trend.
We don't need to spend money.
We've got a bloated squad and ideally would end the window 5 or 6 players down (thereby generating a significant surplus, even if we do sign two or even three £10m+ players).
Also remember 9 of our 10 most expensive signings have been relative flops. Only Modric defies the trend.
Hmmm - While I don't think we necessiarly need to spend a lot of money, I think we do need a few players in.
1. If we are to lose Mason I don't really see another player suited to playing this role (perhaps Paulinho is next best suited?) so I think we need to look for another player who can play that box to box role.
2. If things really have gone sour with Adebayor then we are only one injury away from trouble up front (I know Kane could fill in there, but that would weaken us in the number 10 position).
Delph and Gignac could be smart signings to tide us over and give us competition for places for the remainder of the season. Both of them could probably be signed for less than we would fetch if selling any of Capoue, Dembele, Chiriches or Paulinho.
Not sure about 5 or 6, but at least a couple players down would be fine. And we already have one incoming in Yedlin.
Effectively replacing highly paid older pros with youngsters like Kane, Bentaleb and Mason will significantly cut our wage budget too, for now at least.
We need to thin the squad
- Dembele, Paulinho, Capoue, Townsend -> at least 2 have to go
- Ade, Kaboul, Capoue -> as seemingly not on message, again at least 2 to go
- Vlad if rumours are to believed
So 4, possibly 5 out.
I would hope we are willing to spend on 2 quality players, neutral spend might do it, but maybe a little extra required depending on who we convince.
Was that intentional?
absolutely ...
he functionally belong to two groups that we are trying to minimize ..
Which joker suggested 15 million plus? No, scratch that: who here believes we'll spend anything above what we bring in?!?
People still fall for that 'ambition' malarkey. Can see why it's so useful.
purely to wind you up old bean
we will only spend what we bring in, just hope we spend it more wisely
don't see much movement at all, Veljkovic will probably get another loan (or extend his current one, not sure if he's getting games to be honest), i can't see any realistic big outs that would pay for an in, Chiriches maybe, and whilst we are obviously short on quality the body count is probably about right so I expect we'll wait until the off season
all in all, it's gonna be a break even window