Yeah, I don't really agree. Parker was underrated and Winks, much as I do like him, might be slightly overrated. I don't think he has the creativity of Modric, nowhere near it.
Would be pretty boring if we all thought the same, wouldnt it?
Parker, for me, didnt have half the ability of Winks. Either Technically or Tactically.
He worked his nuts off, which was probably his defining strength. When we played him exclusively as a defensive terrier, sitting in front of the back four and harrassing anything that crossed into our half I thought he was excellent. In that rather limited role, he thrived.
When he decided he was too good for that and wanted to be Stevie G MKII, I think his game was massively exposed and he was more a hinderance to the side than a help.
Winks is nothing like Parker. He strength isnt tenacity.
Its that metronomic passing, like Modric, that allows us to keep the ball, pull teams around and take advantage of openings.
The vast majority of his passes, even if often simple, are forward and progress our play. He makes the team tick, and he makes us slick.
Similar to Modric? Yes. In what he does, and how he does it, I think he is.
As good as Modric? No. Not yet, anyway. I think he has the potential to be that good though, in a very similar way, but only time will tell.