Andy Gray is like the school bully and Richard Keys the nerdy geek who doesn't have any friends so clings onto the bully instead becoming his sidekick.
They were iconic in terms of Sky Sports' coverage of the Premier League particularly in the early years when a lot of Gray's analysis was innovative and ground breaking. Like most things in the Entertainment industry though their time passed and it's time to move on. Can't see them ever returning to Sky.
I really dislike them as people but was frustratingly drawn to their mid-morning show on talksport which regularly had some very interesting guests and great interviews. I have a bit of sympathy with Gray for the comment earlier about his lack of knowledge of European football; to be fair he spent so much time commentating on PL he would have had little time to watch much else in any great depth.
A lot fuss about **** all, it could be argued that CT was ok with this sort of banter, and may have played up to it in previous instances.
Nobody knows, just 2 old boys trying to be geezers!
I disagree. I would be sacked if I spoke to a female colleague like that and quite right too
Wasn't Andy Gray.
Wasn't Andy Gray.
A lot fuss about **** all, it could be argued that CT was ok with this sort of banter, and may have played up to it in previous instances.
Nobody knows, just 2 old boys trying to be geezers!
It was. In the following link, you see a highlight package of the game's goals which interchange between two audio feeds - one with Gray and Martin Tyler, the other with either Jon Champion or Alan Parry doing the call (I can't tell them apart. Same harsh, barking tone).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vxUTsvLKUk
In the final goal highlight, it's clearly the Champion/Parry feed and the commentator clearly cries out Oh No!
But in the feed I was hearing that day:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si6XREWSHsI
- Gray delivers a long, slow OHHH NOHHH!. Then he recovers and gives Spurs a fairer shake, watching the re-play and describing how we "bomb forward".
I never realized until checking this that there was a second OH NO! from that goal. Knuts, the lot of 'em.
I don't think it's out of biast. West Ham were 2-0 up if I remember correctly, went to 2-2, then went 3-2 up.. then it went to 3-3, they would have loved that point from the positioin they were in at the time, only to then go and lose it in the 95th minute, it's more of a footballing "oh no" as opposed to "oh no, west ham have lost, **** off Spurs" . Thats how I thought of it anyway.
It was 100% andy gray. Whether the supposed to be neutral commentator would like the underdog to win or not doesn't matter, it's about being professional, they are supposed to be impartial, saying oh no when one team scores a winner clearly shows he wasn't. Have you ever heard anyone else say something like that, I mean not even the cringeworthy champs league commentators come out with that when an English team concedes a goal!!
I agree. It's more a response to the narrative of the game, as in "Oh no, can you believe what is happening?" rather than "Oh no, Spurs have won". And if there is a component of the latter it reflects the narrative of the season and how valuable points were to West Ham.
Agreed.
:lol: at anyone thinking everyone hates Spurs, ffs grow up.
Agreed.
:lol: at anyone thinking everyone hates Spurs, ffs grow up.