Kingdawson
Banned
Re: Gareth Bale
http://www.marca.com/2013/05/30/en/football/real_madrid/1369899845.html
Lets hope this is true.
http://www.marca.com/2013/05/30/en/football/real_madrid/1369899845.html
Lets hope this is true.
I guess it goes back to losing Waddle and then signing Lineker. We never seem leaps in progress when we sign a top player after losing one, because we never seem to get where we want to be. Imagine having Waddle, Gazza and Lineker in the same team or having Berbatov, Modric and Carrick in the same team. How about we keep what we have and then add to it, how else are we ever going to rise above the occasional 4th place finish?
Im sure we will be looking to improve the team regardless of what happens re Bale. I think it's highly unlikely Levy believed the squad at the end of last summers window was balanced or in any way complete, im sure also that he knew we would need to bring in at least a striker and a playmaker this summer.
Im not hurting as much as you seem to be - until the new stadium is in place we cannot compete at the same level as Arsenal so im prepared to wait until then. However, we CAN build a team good enough to overtake them if we play it smart in the market - we should have finished 3rd under Redknapp with the team we had built and we were very close this season with what id consider a weaker team - so a good summer in the transfer market could see us in with an even better chance.
If you put Bale into another side you don't automatically add 20 goals, he will be replacing someone who is already contributing.
I can't see how having Bale or not matters one bit for the players we want to sign. It's the standing of the club and how much money that's on offer that matters. We are currently just below Arsenal, but above Liverpool in terms of attractiveness IMO. But as we saw with Vertonghen, we can get players to choose us ahead of the scum if the deal is right for the them.
I know, it is frustrating, but im sure you realize it isn't as simple as just saying 'you're staying'
It really is. That is exactly what happened in the Modric to Chelsea saga 2 years ago.
And when their contract runs out and you have no money to buy a replacement?
And when other players see how you treat the players under your employment and decide not to go and 'become stuck at Tottenham'?
It really isn't that simple in real life.
Moreover, players who move to us will generally not be in a position to reject us on such grounds. They will likely be unable to go to any CL club and thus will have to take a punt on the best stepping-stone available. Our best players have consistently gone on to play for Man United and Real Madrid, Spurs are one of the biggest stepping-stones in world football at the moment.
it hurts being so close really fkin hurts and I dont even think we have to go out and spend silly money...... in order to be 5-10 points better off next season what do you think needs to be done?????
You are leaving out the most vital factor MONEY! Chelsea and City and clubs of that ilk just offer silly wages and that usually trumps all logic. Half the time they just sign someone so nobody else can get them. Look at Lukaku, De Bruyne, Moses, Sinclair, Rodwell. Those players all had big reputations and careers heading in the right direction. Instead take the money and be a bit part player/loaneeAny young player with a knowledge of our recent history will surely note 2 things:
1) With some luck we might actually become CL regulars, where all these potential signings want to end up.
2) We have let 3 vital players go for large fees recently, if you are good enough you will be allowed to leave.
Nearly every young player coming to us will do so because either no CL teams want them or they would not be regulars in any of the CL teams that do want them. They will hope that in a couple of years they can start playing every season in the CL. By coming to Tottenham they can achieve this. But if we don't manage it and they still shine, we have a history of letting players go with 2 years remaining on their contract.
Surely we are the perfect stepping-stone club?
yup dont like it but true.
No, you give them a long contract and sell them with 2 years left, like we did with Modric, Berba and probably Carrick too.
We have always respected players' ambitions, but asked that they respect ours also. The contract gives us leverage over both them and other clubs, but ultimately when only 2 years remain we have to sell, otherwise the price will drop dramatically the next summer, as happened with all of Arsenal's best players. What our past tells other players is that if they are world class with 2 years remaining on their contract and we will not be in the CL next season, they will always be able to force a move that summer, it will just take a while as we negotiate an eye-watering fee.
You are leaving out the most vital factor MONEY! Chelsea and City and clubs of that ilk just offer silly wages and that usually trumps all logic. Half the time they just sign someone so nobody else can get them. Look at Lukaku, De Bruyne, Moses, Sinclair, Rodwell. Those players all had big reputations and careers heading in the right direction. Instead take the money and be a bit part player/loanee
If they have thoughts of greater things in the future they wouldn't sign a longer contract to begin with, plus that's not going to stop them leaving. They just have to refuse to play and then you're screwed.
There are plenty of other 'stepping stone' sides out there. It's a bit arrogant to suggest we are the best one available.
Players always sign 4 year contracts at the least with us. Modric signed a 6 year one.
You talk about Spurs getting a bad rep for letting players go - but what club wants to sign a player who flat out refuses to play? I know Modric tried that for a couple of games but he came back into the side again.
Name me a few better prospects than Spurs? Especially for players in the postions where we are in desperately need of strengthening the first team (ST, WF, CM). Yes we may have our equivalents in Spain, Italy, etc. but players suited to English football will have few better options.
Top clubs would all buy players that refuse to play. Generally because the player is refusing to play so he can move to them. Modric, Berbatov, Tevez, Even Squillaci, yet Arsenal still played him.
And your third point is all about moving goalposts.
Firstly 'Surely we are the perfect stepping-stone club?'
But now it's the best stepping stone club for players who play in a certain way in certain positions, but they might have better options?