• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Baleforce said:
It’s fine to fall away for a bit, rebuild, come back have another go.

Always trying to be on it just feeds the arms race.

Klopps comments remind me of cyclists justifying their doping in the 90’s.

If you can’t win without cheating why do you want to win? It has no value.
Click to expand...

Fair viewpoint to have but moot really as the reality is Saudi Sportswashing Machine, Emirates Marketing Project and chelsea already cheat, liverpool and spurs are about to cheat and no doubt man utd and woolwich will cheat soon.
 
AjaxDeSuperYids said:
Fair viewpoint to have but moot really as the reality is Saudi Sportswashing Machine, Emirates Marketing Project and chelsea already cheat, liverpool and spurs are about to cheat and no doubt man utd and woolwich will cheat soon.
Click to expand...

If the rules aren’t enforced then the rules de facto don’t exist. Therefore ‘cheating’ is simply the new reality to be engaged with.
 
Mikey10 said:
If the rules aren’t enforced then the rules de facto don’t exist. Therefore ‘cheating’ is simply the new reality to be engaged with.
Click to expand...
Indeed…. ‘Cheating’ is not complying with FFP. I believe thus far, of the big clubs, only Emirates Marketing Project and PSG have not complied with FFP. The punishment for not complying is too lenient and therefore there is little need for such clubs to comply.

We shouldn’t be accusing clubs trying to get right on the FFP line of cheating, we should instead be questioning our owners on why they allowed us to come in £400m under the FFP line.
 
Finney Is Back said:
Indeed…. ‘Cheating’ is not complying with FFP. I believe thus far, of the big clubs, only Emirates Marketing Project and PSG have not complied with FFP. The punishment for not complying is too lenient and therefore there is little need for such clubs to comply.

We shouldn’t be accusing clubs trying to get right on the FFP line of cheating, we should instead be questioning our owners on why they allowed us to come in £400m under the FFP line.
Click to expand...

Is it because we didn’t have another 400m to spend?

Spending money is such a lazy way to try and improve a team.
 
ricky2tricky4city said:
There's the principle thing as well...is he a corrupt slimeball? Should he be at the club?
Click to expand...

Seems to be 2 things. Overpricing players in the arthur/pjanic swap to get round ffp. Then the players agreeing a 4 month paycut during covid but agnelli paid them 3 months off the books.
It's cheating but not evil. Nobody was hurt.
 
Lilbaz said:
Seems to be 2 things. Overpricing players in the arthur/pjanic swap to get round ffp. Then the players agreeing a 4 month paycut during covid but agnelli paid them 3 months off the books.
It's cheating but not evil. Nobody was hurt.
Click to expand...

I agree with this, if that’s it and we deem him to be doing a good job, we should absolutely stand by him.
 
Finney Is Back said:
Indeed…. ‘Cheating’ is not complying with FFP. I believe thus far, of the big clubs, only Emirates Marketing Project and PSG have not complied with FFP. The punishment for not complying is too lenient and therefore there is little need for such clubs to comply.

We shouldn’t be accusing clubs trying to get right on the FFP line of cheating, we should instead be questioning our owners on why they allowed us to come in £400m under the FFP line.
Click to expand...

No. Every club should be self sufficient and not rely on owners putting money in to survive. Because when they stop the club can be in massive trouble.
 
Lol I bet there are thousands of not millions of businesses that have five a little fiddle here and there
 
fudging idiots

"profit before glory" so they want glory and financial loss instead, that'll last

"we want our club back" that wonderful time under Sugar

everyone who is there, all 14 of them, dropped of by their parents, is a stupid clam
 
Gazza said:
All up for debating enic and respect both sides of the fence but this protest is a joke almost as big as the supporters trust.
Click to expand...
It’s because they can’t propose an alternative
No one can say what’s next other than get rid
As I said a Few days ago, it’s Brexit
Arsenals fans did the same thing and united too
Silent now though arent they
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back