Gordinho
Banned
I'm not sure Bob Crow's ever been compared to Marlon Brando before!Dude, I'm just ribbing you that the pic in your profile looks a little like Marlon Brando, kind of a tinkle take, but at your age one I'd be happy with!
I'm not sure Bob Crow's ever been compared to Marlon Brando before!Dude, I'm just ribbing you that the pic in your profile looks a little like Marlon Brando, kind of a tinkle take, but at your age one I'd be happy with!
No one ever seems to ask the simple question. If the EU is so brick, why are we in it? Surely if it was just driving voters away and had no tangible benefit, leaving would be a political coupe
No one ever seems to ask the simple question. If the EU is so brick, why are we in it? Surely if it was just driving voters away and had no tangible benefit, leaving would be a political coupe
After nigh on forty years in it and with umpteen changes of government yet no serious attempt to leave it then as you say the benefits must outweigh the negatives, so are we saying that consecutive governments of various hues are happy to have a modicum of protest as it's a useful diversion from bigger issues they're struggling with?
I'm fairly sure the EU would be more than happy to have a free trade agreement with the UK. We are massive consumers and have a trade deficit. One of the countries that buys the highest no of cars in the world etc.
We have not been given a vote on it though have we? why are they so afraid our letting the people decide.
Watched a play last night you would have loved gordi, it made out howard wilson to be a hero and thatcher to be a brute. I would have got up and shouted abuse had it not been for my bad back.
I'm probably out of step here but I don't like referendums, I believe elected parties should be free to govern, if we want to change the way our parties govern we have our opportunity at the ballot box. MPs are free to defect to UKIP as well if they don't like their party's stance on Europe (bit deceitful to get elected on party lines then jump ship though).
I think the anti-Europe feeling about at the moment is another manifestation of the "we're having a bad time at the moment so let's blame it on immigrants" syndrome. In short, when times are hard nationalism and xenophobia come to the fore. There was a referendum on this in 1975 with more than two thirds of voters choosing to stay in. No coincidence that the country was in the doldrums then and dissenting voices managed to get the referendum held.
I'm guessing that if there was a free vote among MPs tomorrow with a simple Yes/No answer to the question Should We leave The EC then MPs would weigh up all the pros and cons and we'd stay in. Don't get me wrong, I'm neither pro or anti Europe, I just think that there are more benefits to being in Europe than MPs choose to make public or they'd have made the decision long ago to take us out.
What was the name of the play?
I'm not entirely sure why that comment was directed at me, it's Chich who has twice mistaken Harold Wison for Howard but I am big enough to concentrate on the points he was putting across in his posts re Wilson than petty point scoring.Who's 'Howard Wilson' ? Oh you mean Harold Wilson the Labour prime minister and latter day Russian spy. :ross:
I'm not entirely sure why that comment was directed at me, it's Chich who has twice mistaken Harold Wison for Howard but I am big enough to concentrate on the points he was putting across in his posts re Wilson than petty point scoring.
I'm not entirely sure why that comment was directed at me, it's Chich who has twice mistaken Harold Wison for Howard but I am big enough to concentrate on the points he was putting across in his posts re Wilson than petty point scoring.
Agree about referenda being a poor system. We have elected MPs to represent us an make decisions on a variety of issues which should mostly please us but not all the time. In referenda we would vote for more spending and less taxes, while the MPs should be balancing the two. California is in a mess because they have Reagan era propositions (=referenda) controlling property taxes and all sorts mandated spending (e.g. K12 education) which leaves the elected government of the day with little freedom of action. Votes from thirty years ago dictate what recently elected politicians can do. Unfortunately the modern mentality is to expect the MPs to do what we want in every case and the MPs pander to us, a big reason why there are debt and budget crises in most of the democratic world.
In principle I don't mind referenda on important constitutional issues, but for important issues like EU membership or Scottish independence a simple 50% plus one majority is unsuitable. Say 50.00001% vote for EU withdrawal now, it might be 50.00001% against next month, and you can't keep leaving and rejoining. It either needs a supermajority, like constitutional changes in the US, or some form of consistent pattern over a number of years (e.g. majorities in support in votes taken say a decade apart).
The proposed referendum on Europe now is a bit stupid. With the Euro crisis they are going to have to make major changes to the EU treaties to save the Euro and this will take time. We should wait until we see what the new treaties look like before making a decision. Instead if the Conservatives win the next election, we will make an important decision on our future on how we guess the treaties will turn out and using a simple majority where a few votes could be decisive.
Agree about referenda being a poor system. We have elected MPs to represent us an make decisions on a variety of issues which should mostly please us but not all the time. In referenda we would vote for more spending and less taxes, while the MPs should be balancing the two. California is in a mess because they have Reagan era propositions (=referenda) controlling property taxes and all sorts mandated spending (e.g. K12 education) which leaves the elected government of the day with little freedom of action. Votes from thirty years ago dictate what recently elected politicians can do. Unfortunately the modern mentality is to expect the MPs to do what we want in every case and the MPs pander to us, a big reason why there are debt and budget crises in most of the democratic world.
In principle I don't mind referenda on important constitutional issues, but for important issues like EU membership or Scottish independence a simple 50% plus one majority is unsuitable. Say 50.00001% vote for EU withdrawal now, it might be 50.00001% against next month, and you can't keep leaving and rejoining. It either needs a supermajority, like constitutional changes in the US, or some form of consistent pattern over a number of years (e.g. majorities in support in votes taken say a decade apart).
The proposed referendum on Europe now is a bit stupid. With the Euro crisis they are going to have to make major changes to the EU treaties to save the Euro and this will take time. We should wait until we see what the new treaties look like before making a decision. Instead if the Conservatives win the next election, we will make an important decision on our future on how we guess the treaties will turn out and using a simple majority where a few votes could be decisive.
Oh yeah sure the EU is suddenly going to become less involved in countries business. Everyone knows the EU wants to become the united states of europe and what changes do you think they are going to make exactly?
They wont make any they are con merchants and im long enough in the tooth to see the game they are playing. The is no need to wait to see what happens, anti EU feelings have been there for a long time and have been steadily growing. The left have to find a way to belittle them it is what left wing politics does best, actually it is all the left do.
FFS jts! You've started him off now, this will go one of two ways, he'll either drink a bottle of Scotch and then fill the bath with balloons and masturbate or he'll go into town and punch a rock legend's lights out.
It'll all end in tears.
Yes but he showed his colours. I voted for Thatcher and believe in free market economics and individual liberties, even when inconvenient. People should vote for things based on real information and rational consideration, not mindless ideology c/o the Daily Mail.
Why cant i do both gordi? why?