No one is infalable though even with success
Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
Ofcourse not. But us deciding he is wrong is based on what?
No one is infalable though even with success
Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
I was talking generically and about the hypocrisy of views more than Conte being wrong about Spence, time will tell though on that.Ofcourse not. But us deciding he is wrong is based on what?
Read the 10 posts above your own post.I thiught he was getting dogs abuse defensively?
Probably based on the performances he has put in at Rennes. Whereas before it was pure conjecture, as he did not play at all, at least now we have something tangible to assess his level. A small sample size, granted, but if Spence continues to put in good displays through the end of the season, I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be questioning why we bought Porro, instead of giving Djed a chance. Even if Porro matches his performances at Spurs with Spence's at Rennes.Ofcourse not. But us deciding he is wrong is based on what?
Probably based on the performances he has put in at Rennes. Whereas before it was pure conjecture, as he did not play at all, at least now we have something tangible to assess his level. A small sample size, granted, but if Spence continues to put in good displays through the end of the season, I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be questioning why we bought Porro, instead of giving Djed a chance. Even if Porro matches his performances at Spurs with Spence's at Rennes.
Probably based on the performances he has put in at Rennes. Whereas before it was pure conjecture, as he did not play at all, at least now we have something tangible to assess his level. A small sample size, granted, but if Spence continues to put in good displays through the end of the season, I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be questioning why we bought Porro, instead of giving Djed a chance. Even if Porro matches his performances at Spurs with Spence's at Rennes.
It would depend on why he is getting loaned out. If it is to learn the role, then it is right for him to get loaned out. If it is because he simply isn't in Conte's plans, given he is putting in good performances many would say it is wrong and he should be getting more chances with Spurs.Ok. Conte sent perisic on loan to byern to learn the role he wanted. Byern won the league (obviously) but also the cl. When he came back inter won serie a. Perisic being named in the team of the year.
Now was conte wrong or right to loan him?
I don't know. But it worked out. Is spence being loaned out right or wrong? I don't know either.
It would depend on why he is getting loaned out. If it is to learn the role, then it is right for him to get loaned out. If it is because he simply isn't in Conte's plans, given he is putting in good performances many would say it is wrong and he should be getting more chances with Spurs.
Well at least Porro signing has turned Royale into a 40m player anyway….said this in the OMT, Porro might turn out quality, who knows, but another brick level performance yesterday. I can handle that, he's acclimatising sure, but please don't tell me Spence wasn't capable of putting an at least an equal performance in both the games he played, as he couldn't have played any worse.
Can't help we've spunked 40M needlessly. As i said, Spence may turn out rubbish and Porro amazing, but Porro been given more game time than Spence ever got so maybe we will never know.
Well at least Porro signing has turned Royale into a 40m player anyway….
I think a manager like Poch could make a great attacking right back out of him.
The only way Spence would have had a chance under Conte is if both Doherty and Royale were out injured.
Conte kept saying Moura or Kulusevski could play there. Kulusevski has been used there late in some games.
He still wouldn't get a game
And Perisic.The only way Spence would have had a chance under Conte is if both Doherty and Royale were out injured.