Not looking to have a go at you personally Steve, but this use of stats bugs me.
Here's a narrative, let's go looking for any stats that we can shoehorn in to support that narrative.
-Surely there's a massive overlap between "chances created" and "key passes". Usually one is reported, because one makes sense. Why both? To get another 0 in the list perhaps?
- 0 crosses? Yeah. Is getting Alli into crossing positions a real part of our attacking plan? Are his number of crosses at all a reflection of how he plays when he plays well? Nope, no. But it's another 0 for the list, so chuck it in.
- 0 long passes. Now, admittedly, Alli tried a couple of speculative long passes in the second half, would have been good if those had been better. Are long passes a part of his game? No. Are we looking for that when he plays well? No. But it's a 0, add it to the list.
-Whoscored has him with 2 tackles, again, admittedly, that's sometimes a misleading stat, but why wasn't it included? I can guarantee it would have been had it been 0.
-Whoscored also has him making 3 clearances. Again, same point as above.
He didn't play particularly well, but he did alright. Can't see why he's being singled out.