• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Daniel Levy - Former Chairman

Why they couldn’t have left him in place and just said, you are in charge of the sponsorship, the running of the club off of the pitch and all the other money making strategies that doesn’t involve transfers is beyond me. Would have worked well for him.

The story has several chapters I suspect. We may never know some of them.
 
I'm surprised that the Lewis's don't have first refusal on Levy's shares and vice versa, would be fairly standard practice at least for the Lewis side to be able to buy Levy out as they're majority owners.
 
I'm surprised that the Lewis's don't have first refusal on Levy's shares and vice versa, would be fairly standard practice at least for the Lewis side to be able to buy Levy out as they're majority owners.
Weird how Enic and the club has effectively denied it, you would think they would know if their shares were sold
 
I think that would have the potential to make more sense.

On transfers ....pre window they probably looked at VV and Lange and thought 'maybe we still need DL for negotiation' ...thinking about it who else was going to do it? ....(Paratici ?)
They very possibly had a succession plan in place with Paratici taking over negotiations starting in the Jan window.

However, if the plan was to fire Levy, and not let him voluntarily give up his responsibilities, then I doubt they would’ve let him negotiate 150 mil of transfers in last summer’s window. Purely conjecture but the math adds up better than if they were planning to fire him all along.
 
Back