I still can’t reconcile how ENIC get the lions share of the credit for the overall trajectory of the club during their tenure, but they escape almost any criticism and are not at least partially responsible for the clubs lack of silverware. You can bet your life ENIC would take most (if not all) of the credit if we had won league titles and CL’s. In what other business or company does the head of the company not become answerable for the success of the company? Especially given how heavily involved Levy is in the football operations side of things. The company I work for is circa two to three hundred employees, possibly a clunky metaphor but that’s similar to my CEO also running the sales team and being operations director but having no responsibility to the overall position of the company.
I think even ENIC’s most churlish and ardent critics wouldn’t disagree they have grown the club exponentially off the pitch, whilst the managers (Poch and Redknapp) raised the profile on the pitch getting us to the champions league.
Id argue the next managerial appointment is the most crucial in Levy’s entire reign. The club needs to get back into the champions league. We need the revenue to continue to pay off the stadium as quickly as possible. He needs to appoint a manager who plays attractive but above all else, we need to start winning things. After 20 years, I find it quite strange how fans can be accused of being impatient or told to stop “crying” for suggesting ENIC should be answerable at the very least for a dearth of trophies or our sluggishness or lack of proactivity in the transfer market with both incomings and outgoings. We need to pick the right manager and back him. I’d also like ENIC to engage with the supporters and make it clear what the goals of the club are in the next 5 years. I don’t think that is being spoilt, entitled or brattish but I’m sure others will disagree