• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Daniel Levy - Chairman

elltrev said:
Interested in your response to this @DubaiSpur!
Click to expand...
I’ll jump in before him
Revenue means nothing without profit
The key for us is out cost base is sensible…. Wages
Fans regular complain when it’s highlighted we don’t spend as high a ratio as others on wages but… we’re about the right level and other teams are trying to get there
The new rules mean it has do happen soon
Either increase turnover (we have) or cut your actual wages. The latter is an issue because that means an inferior player
 
Bedfordspurs said:
I’ll jump in before him
Revenue means nothing without profit
The key for us is out cost base is sensible…. Wages
Fans regular complain when it’s highlighted we don’t spend as high a ratio as others on wages but… we’re about the right level and other teams are trying to get there
The new rules mean it has do happen soon
Either increase turnover (we have) or cut your actual wages. The latter is an issue because that means an inferior player
Click to expand...

Depends what you are using it to show. I believe @elltrev is showing that Spurs have grown off the field at a better rate than any club other than Emirates Marketing Project in the time that ENIC have run the club, I think in an attempt to counter the argument from posters like Dubai who like to suggest that our growth has not been impacted positively by the owners and is something that would have just happened anyway without them.
 
Last edited:
billyiddo said:
Depends what you are using it show. I believe @elltrev is showing that Spurs have grown off the field at a better rate than any club other than Emirates Marketing Project in the time that ENIC have run the club, I think in an attempt to counter the argument from posters like Dubai who like to suggest that our growth has not been an impacted positively by the owners and is something that would have just happened anyway without them.
Click to expand...
Yeah I get that
It’s why I said clubs have to choose
Either grow your revenue or cut your wages
 
billyiddo said:
Depends what you are using it to show. I believe @elltrev is showing that Spurs have grown off the field at a better rate than any club other than Emirates Marketing Project in the time that ENIC have run the club, I think in an attempt to counter the argument from posters like Dubai who like to suggest that our growth has not been impacted positively by the owners and is something that would have just happened anyway without them.
Click to expand...

I think the commercial growth Levy has overseen is undeniably the most spectacular in all of football. It blows away EMP's due to the source nature not being an oil-rich nation state. In fairness to @DubaiSpur I don't think he'd deny that (I am making an assumption of course)...
 
Gazza said:
Imagine Beyoncé not being at our stadium and up in Liverpool at Bramley dock.
Click to expand...

The most beautiful thing is all those Beyonce fans from other London clubs paying into the THFC bank account. Then in the future Beyonce heads up to Liverpool and all the LFC fans have to pay Everton FC to watch her.
 
thfcsteff said:
I think the commercial growth Levy has overseen is undeniably the most spectacular in all of football. It blows away EMP's due to the source nature not being an oil-rich nation state. In fairness to @DubaiSpur I don't think he'd deny that (I am making an assumption of course)...
Click to expand...

No, Dubai has definitely said the clubs growth off the field is down to circumstance rather than anything the club owners have done.
 
billyiddo said:
No, Dubai has definitely said the clubs growth off the field is down to circumstance rather than anything the club owners have done.
Click to expand...

I think it’s true the owners have done a brilliant job growing the club from a commercial standpoint, but it’s also true that the PL clubs have got richer due to the nature of the tv deals and the fact that the PL is such a popular worldwide brand. Arsenal are a super rich club now but they’ve not don anything particularly special on the pitch in the last 15 years.
 
If only someone would take the time to work out what % of transfers Levy chooses to complete right at the end of the transfer window, compared to the other big teams.

Then we would see what a penny pinching idiot Levy is. Oh hang on, someone did:

bafkreidhc35dsdbn5ihvsosuhtzfokehg2molpj57ijv43bhdqrqk2uzqq@jpeg
 
spurs' magna carter said:
Reports all over the place now that Tel has turned us down. And for me this sums it all up. Throw everything at another player that looks at us and thinks

Ambitious? No

Has a real desire to win? No

Will they pay me decent money? No

Would love to have been a fly on the wall as Tel told Scrooge's offspring 'I er....no'.

Levy, source of the bleed. The man NEEDS to go.
Click to expand...
Hello @spurs' magna carter
How are you feeling now that the window has closed, and Spurs landed Tel?
 
Bullet said:
Hello @spurs' magna carter
How are you feeling now that the window has closed, and Spurs landed Tel?
Click to expand...

How are you feeling you deluded mug?

Still madly and deeply in love with the all encompassing daniel levy?

Yeah thought as much.

And by the way, it was big Ange that landed Tel not your little crooked, corrupt greedy c@!# of a supposed chairman.

One trophy in seventeen years, you'll never sing that.

I think you'll find the attached photo very fitting of this said chairman.

Look at the substitutions that Liverpool are bringing on. That's what this club should have, not what you're chairman believes we should have as the fourth Liverpool goal goes in.

GET RID OF THE RAT!!!!
 

Attachments

  • 20250206_214050.jpg
    20250206_214050.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 9
In the last couple of seasons I have gone from a full on Levy backer to a skeptic.

Now I cannot support him what so ever anymore.

Absoloute brick show we are in and there is nothing in the way of reinforcments equvalent to the position we are in.

I get it... when faced with stick or twist in terms of transfers Levy will always stick.

Sometimes you can justify that. Not want to shake the boat.

Not in the position we are in.

It demands SOMETHING

I refuse to believe we cannot afford SOMETHING.

What was the stadium for?
 
spurs' magna carter said:
How are you feeling you deluded mug?
Still madly and deeply in love with the all encompassing daniel levy?
Yeah thought as much.
And by the way, it was big Ange that landed Tel not your little crooked, corrupt greedy c@!# of a supposed chairman.
One trophy in seventeen years, you'll never sing that.
I think you'll find the attached photo very fitting of this said chairman.
Look at the substitutions that Liverpool are bringing on. That's what this club should have, not what you're chairman believes we should have as the fourth Liverpool goal goes in.
GET RID OF THE RAT!!!!
Click to expand...
 
Craig_J said:
In the last couple of seasons I have gone from a full on Levy backer to a skeptic.

Now I cannot support him what so ever anymore.

Absoloute brick show we are in and there is nothing in the way of reinforcments equvalent to the position we are in.

I get it... when faced with stick or twist in terms of transfers Levy will always stick.

Sometimes you can justify that. Not want to shake the boat.

Not in the position we are in.

It demands SOMETHING

I refuse to believe we cannot afford SOMETHING.

What was the stadium for?
Click to expand...
Afford something? We're the 3rd or 4th biggest spenders since we moved into the stadium and that's what it was for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back