Brendan Rodgers and Mario Balotelli
Balotelli maybe, but reading that article, it didn't seem staff payoffs (e.g. BR) fall into same bracket (but could be wrong)
Brendan Rodgers and Mario Balotelli
Balotelli maybe, but reading that article, it didn't seem staff payoffs (e.g. BR) fall into same bracket (but could be wrong)
fudge me ... people talk about buying/selling .. here's where the stacked deck is (quote from above link)
Tottenham’s wage bill rose vey slightly by £0.4 million from £100.4 million to £100.8 million, reducing the wages to turnover ratio from 56% to 51%, the lowest since the 46% achieved in 2008. Wages have only risen by a cumulative £10 million (11%) in the last five years, which is a striking demonstration of Spurs’ ability to control costs.
Tottenham’s wage bill is much lower than the top five clubs: Chelsea £216 million, Manchester United £203 million, Emirates Marketing Project £194 million, Arsenal £192 million and Liverpool £166 million. In other words, Tottenham have largely performed in line with expectation, though are punching above their weight this season.
and just have to ask ... who the fudge is Pool paying all that money to?
Great to read an analysis showing just how well our club is run - on pretty much every front. The only negative being the ever-widening gap in commercial revenue between ourselves and the big boys. Hopefully the new stadium plus regular CL qualification will help sort that to give us a royal flush.A fascinating read from the Swiss Ramble on our finances
http://swissramble.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/tottenham-hotspur-moving-on-up.html?m=1
fudge me ... people talk about buying/selling .. here's where the stacked deck is (quote from above link)
Tottenham’s wage bill rose vey slightly by £0.4 million from £100.4 million to £100.8 million, reducing the wages to turnover ratio from 56% to 51%, the lowest since the 46% achieved in 2008. Wages have only risen by a cumulative £10 million (11%) in the last five years, which is a striking demonstration of Spurs’ ability to control costs.
Tottenham’s wage bill is much lower than the top five clubs: Chelsea £216 million, Manchester United £203 million, Emirates Marketing Project £194 million, Arsenal £192 million and Liverpool £166 million. In other words, Tottenham have largely performed in line with expectation, though are punching above their weight this season.
and just have to ask ... who the fudge is Pool paying all that money to?
I said he was one to watch for the future, i still think he is good and he can have a good career if he gets chances at different clubs, did ok at burnley but showed a little bit of a lack of ambition by going back to bournemouth. He is young he can come good still.
Im not bothered about being taken seriously, this is not a serious website it is one people come on to talk to ****e, if people critcise you then you play the victim and cry i have learnt this, does not bother me. A man must respond to the world around him.
Ley has done an average job, some things good some things bad, i do feel having a chairman for so long has given the club some stability, shame he does not give his managers the same privilege.
http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/new-dawn-at-spurs-as-sugars-era-ends-6356380.html
27 February 2001 - The day it all started. Levy has been in charge for 15 years.
And we have come a long way in that time, we have seen some great players wear our shirt, been in and around the CL, made a attempted challenge on the Prem title, got one of the best training facilities in the world and I great new ground being built.
My only small gripe is the lack of trophys that we have tried to win, but I except that in modern football its not that important to win things anymore. ( which is a pity).
Did we really not beat Chelsea at the Lane for 14 seasons?