Bedfordspurs
Chris Waddle
But if it gets the players to finally contribute it mate workI think Burnley were first to do it, weren’t they?
Not that that makes any difference to how terrible it is - and how terrible it looks.
But if it gets the players to finally contribute it mate workI think Burnley were first to do it, weren’t they?
Not that that makes any difference to how terrible it is - and how terrible it looks.
Levy is getting pilloried for this but slightly unfair.
People need to read the statement in full and he’s been smart by putting the emphasis firmly on the players to agree a wage cut.
I presume this will be with the pfa etc a collective wage cut across the PL rather than individual.
Definitely not in the same category - he has done what loads of companies (many of whom will be richer than THFC) have done already.He’s by no means alone, but this is really showing the class of some owners of businesses.
I don’t disagree with the statement, but gutting the wages of the lowest paid when others in the company get paid more in a week is a disgrace - him and Lewis could cover these wages with ease - whisky these cuts could lead to people being unable to pay mortgages.
Add him to the bransons/Ashleys/Tim Martins of the world.
Definitely not in the same category - he has done what loads of companies (many of whom will be richer than THFC) have done already.
I don't like it and hope the players make the call to take cuts which will cover it all. That's where I'm looking.
Definitely not in the same category - he has done what loads of companies (many of whom will be richer than THFC) have done already.
I don't like it and hope the players make the call to take cuts which will cover it all. That's where I'm looking.
How does the system work though? Does Levy have to "fully furlough" those workers to get the 80% from the government?
I.e. he can't be seen to pay them a top-up amount, as that is not properly in the spirit of the government scheme?
Most people will survive on 80%. And they would all far rather be on that then 0% as many freelancers and ex-workers are.
He took a £3 million bonus for delivering the stadium 9 months late. I wonder how much bonus he’d have paid himself for delivering it on time and to budget?So, if the players take the hit let’s hope he goes back and agrees to top up the missing 20% of the furloughed wages. He could also take a pay cut himself - or give back the very large personal bonuses he’s been awarded.
He took a £3 million bonus for delivering the stadium 9 months late. I wonder how much bonus he’d have paid himself for delivering it on time and to budget?
and loads that complain are the same ones who complain we don’t pay enough for our players wages etc...
I said it before, when we were stiffing our contractors over the living wage - I don't care if the club pays the 20th-highest wages in the league, if we take care of the community in Haringey, pay our staff well, keep ticket prices low and plough our profits back into the local area.
Being a club means more to me than being a goddamn business, and always will. It represents a community, and people working together for the good of that community. If acting like it means not spending hundreds of millions of pounds on the latest useless rando with a manbag and an inflated sense of self-worth, I have zero problems with making that tradeoff. I'll follow us in League 2 if I have to.
We do neither, though. When it comes to doing the right thing, we plead that we're a business and have to put profits first. When it comes to buying players, we always plead poverty and restraint.
Today, we pled poverty and restraint while explaining why Tottenham Hotspur plc, a super-rich club where the chairman just paid himself 3m in bonuses, wants to have the ordinary bloke on the street pay its staff, who are struggling to make ends meet.
Pathetic. And utterly contemptible.