-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Coronavirus
- Thread starter markysimmo
- Start date
Danishfurniturelover
the prettiest spice girl
Or white people lecturing people of colour on what is or isn’t racist based on their experience and how they should behave when they are faced with it
Surely we should have a set of laws that everyone has to follow and anyone falling foul of it gets punished as with every other area of life. Pretty simple really.
Unfortunately race and environmentalism are the two burgeoning world religions.
AuroRaman
Chris Armstrong
Agreed. However when laws and regulations are enforced in a manner which disproportionately affects one (or sometimes more) group of people, the end result is almost always the use of force to promote change, as history has shown us. This isn't a 'white person' problem, its a systemic issue globally which is always being addressed. At this moment in time it is at the forefront of a lot of political and socio-economic discussion and most prominent in the westernised nations. I believe this is because we are the frontrunners when it comes to ensuring everyone has a 'fair shot'. A lot of progress has been made but still a helluva long way to go.
I’ll be honest, I’ve no idea what anyone is arguing about anymore.
I just came here for some good and fashioned, relaxing, Coronavirus chat. But instead found it’s turned into a hybrid of Prisoner Cell Block H, and Mississippi Burning...
Yes, you beauty!
Legohamster
Cecil Poynton
Think you are more than likely correct.
As soon as Hanrooster mentioned a mutation (has it mutated anywhere else?) it was happening.
Drakeford jumped on it straight away as to why the firebreak didnt work.
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
What are the indications of the mutation?
More contagious, more virulent, has it drifted genetically enough to cause second infections??
What's causing the extra worry? Compared to other strains being around?
More contagious, more virulent, has it drifted genetically enough to cause second infections??
What's causing the extra worry? Compared to other strains being around?
milo
Jack L. Jones
We won't know until the data is released but this has been the prevent strain in some European countries and hasn't appeared to be more infectious or virulent there.
Mikey10
Frederic Kanoute
The mutation is the excuse to do what was obviously common sense all along.
Johnson, as ever, didn’t want to lead or take a potentially unpopular decision.
StephenH
David Ginola
this!
Everything I've read suggests it's just more contagious. Nothing to worry about.
Last edited:
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
Was the various strains and its geographical movements laid out in that Reuters tweet someone posted earlier?
Anyway, is this just being used as a vehicle for 'disappointing' news as if this new strain isn't any more contagious then it matters little what strain it is?
milo
Jack L. Jones
I posted a link to the prevalent strains in different countries after Hanrooster mentioned it in the Commons earlier in the week.
I would wait to see the data before drawing any conclusions about the reasons for stronger measures but it is clear that relaxing the measures earlier in the month has resulted in a dramatic increase in case numbers in the SE
Grays_1890
Chris Jones
With the Vaccine upon us I wanted to break my self imposed ban to just ask one hugely hypothetical question to gauge a mood on here.
If after the Vaccines have been administered to everyone and normality resumes but the vaccine isn't full proof BUT they could get deaths into a stable number between 10,000 and 50,000 annually like seasonal flu BUT it means life is back to pre Covid would people accept that or would you be wanting to see restrictions for as long as it takes to get annual loss of life as close to 0 as possible?
I'm not going to post again but its just a question that's been on my brain since all the talk of Vaccines so I'm interested in the wide spectrum of views
If after the Vaccines have been administered to everyone and normality resumes but the vaccine isn't full proof BUT they could get deaths into a stable number between 10,000 and 50,000 annually like seasonal flu BUT it means life is back to pre Covid would people accept that or would you be wanting to see restrictions for as long as it takes to get annual loss of life as close to 0 as possible?
I'm not going to post again but its just a question that's been on my brain since all the talk of Vaccines so I'm interested in the wide spectrum of views
Stupid clams.Phew, looks like it’s not lockdown but Tier 4 instead