Lying. Funnelling wedge to their pals. Three word slogans. Power grabs. Good at u-turns too.Pretty damning.
But then should we be surprised? Is there anything that this government have done well?
The vaccine won't fix this in reality. It will probably cover 30% according to some models. Our challenge here is recovering the hearts and minds and rebuilding trust so we can function in a different way till there is a system that protects all.
The problem for the UK is that the govt has lost trust due to them being incompetent cuunts.
Is that right? Only 30% effective or do you mean something else?The vaccine won't fix this in reality. It will probably cover 30% according to some models. Our challenge here is recovering the hearts and minds and rebuilding trust so we can function in a different way till there is a system that protects all.
The problem for the UK is that the govt has lost trust due to them being incompetent cuunts.
Is that right? Only 30% effective or do you mean something else?
Ah. He is playing the numbers game a little using flu vaccination comparisons to do the maths. The vaccine itself he is saying is 75% likely to make you immune which is also a guess at this time.So this article says 56% but I have seen models that say lower.
Are we in some ways heading for an impossible outcome to all this regardless of what anyone believes is the correct course.
We were trying to develop a vaccine that will allow the world to resume, one that will save lives, but we have a flu jab now which in development for how long which isn't a definitive cure, so what chance do we have of finding a vaccine from a standing start that is better than the cure we have for flu. The current flu jab works better in youth than elderly so if this vaccine follows a similar track we will still be fudged.
Are we putting too much reliance on a vaccine?
Getting this virus to the level of flu would be an excellent outcome. We are on the way with treatments; a vaccine would be a great help - even one that works at 50% would be a great start. It would only improve from there.
Fauci was on Andrew Marr this morning; he seemed reasonably confident that life would be heading towards normality by the second or third quarter of next year. He’s usually pretty conservative in his outlook.
That's optimistic which is great. I'm slightly more sceptical for reasons mentioned but I do hope the wait and hope for vaccine is worth it and yields results I really do.
It's hugely important in the greater context too. Even just one misstep and the anti-vaccine crowd will become even louder. The more that bunch of idiots grows, the more at risk the rest of us are.
For example:
I've seen that there are a few (meaning virtually none) that have had COVID-19 and also have some long term conditions.
So far nobody credible has gone further than to say there may be a link.
So if you're asking me how much I care about something that might not exist and, if it does, only exists in immeasurably small numbers, my answer is not at all.
No. Govts shouldn't be able to compel people to do anything.Ah. He is playing the numbers game a little using flu vaccination comparisons to do the maths. The vaccine itself he is saying is 75% likely to make you immune which is also a guess at this time.
Anyway it will be interesting how much pressure will be put on people to get vaccinated when it is available.
Here is the unsaid question in that article. Should there be compulsory vaccinations for all?
No. Govts shouldn't be able to compel people to do anything.
Instead it should be a prerequisite for receiving benefits, medical treatment, etc.
Lockdowns don't work though. LOL.