Danishfurniturelover
the prettiest spice girl
Utter flimflam
I do my upmost to fit in and not stand out.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....envoy-heaps-praise-on-sweden-s-covid-strategy
Couldn’t make it up really.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....envoy-heaps-praise-on-sweden-s-covid-strategy
Couldn’t make it up really.
But, most importantly, they've done a far better job of keeping the country running.For a country of 10m, Sweden's done almost as brick a job at keeping their population alive as we have.
The WHO guy seems to be praising the fact they have a population who'll do what they're told, and believe their government, rather than anything specific to their decisions on how to approach this. (Link now says he's backtracked.)
Interesting. Still, a marginal difference is a difference all the same.I don't think that's a universally accepted truth just yet, for example:
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...trategy-a-cautionary-tale-or-a-success-story/
Higher taxes are the worst possible outcome here. Probably worse than Professor Panic's Doomsday machine predicted.I see the meltdown about higher taxes has begun
anyone that pushed for the lockdown can’t complain about high taxes/cuts
Higher taxes are the worst possible outcome here. Probably worse than Professor Panic's Doomsday machine predicted.
Think at severe stage (point of ventilation) 32% die rather than 40% when using a steroid as an intervention.
But, most importantly, they've done a far better job of keeping the country running.
Somewhere between 2 and 4 percent by most measures.Their GDP has collapsed as much as those nations that had a hard lock down. As usual you don't know what you are talking about. They derived zero economic benefit from letting the virus rip.
Their GDP has collapsed as much as those nations that had a hard lock down. As usual you don't know what you are talking about. They derived zero economic benefit from letting the virus rip.