-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Coronavirus
- Thread starter markysimmo
- Start date
elyid
Milija Aleksic
I guess hopefully that’s the case, as would mean the mortality rate is [currently] much lower than assumed.
milo
Jack L. Jones
No it wouldn't. The higher number includes people who currently display no symptoms and are unaware that they have it. You'd expect 100 deaths from that group.
SpurMeUp
Les Howe
And I think 10,000 as an estimation could be too few. The 'direction of travel' from the government seemed to be, how will we try and protect the elderly and the NHS. There is no chance to contain the virus. The cat is out the bag. They expect 80% to get it. It spreads easily and for most healthy people there are few symptoms. For the young, almost none.
I think it is a fair assertion that the mortality rate is far far lower than the testing data suggests. To me, it would appear that morality is significantly lower than 1%. Most people won't move into 'phase 2' of the virus where there can be complications. Thus, older people should not stress themselves, tire themselves out, must eat healthy food, wash hands and keep clear of lots of people.
I think we can all agree on that.
SpurMeUp
Les Howe
a spur from swansea
Naybet
i know one spike that will happen because of this lockdown.......the birth rate will increase in Dec/Jan of this year lol....what else is there to do!!
Heda SPURSCZ
Steven Caulker
yeah, I think that is the reason.
I'll have to go to Old Town, going to be great to actually walk around without hordes of people there
, good idea
milo
Jack L. Jones
That's not true, other countries have.
The mortality rate has come from actual deaths not testing. I think that you are right that the number of people reported to have the disease is probably under reported but you do not know how many will die of it until all those that currently have it have either recovered or died.
There is no phase two, some people have more severe symptoms than others, particularly the elderly and those with underlying health conditions.
Everyone needs to take action to reduce the risk to those most at risk. The more widespread the disease, the more at risk they are.
What are people on here doing in their lives?
I ask because I'm at work & my wife has called in a panic as she's spoken to her brother who has decided to self isolate (take kid out of school etc) despite having no sign of symptoms & not knowing anyone who does. I'm a relatively BAU type of person anyway but am I being careless?
I ask because I'm at work & my wife has called in a panic as she's spoken to her brother who has decided to self isolate (take kid out of school etc) despite having no sign of symptoms & not knowing anyone who does. I'm a relatively BAU type of person anyway but am I being careless?
Glenda's Legs
Paul Walsh
Bugger. Just arrived here today and we were going to go along to one of the days play in the first test.
Only current 2 cases here - so far.
monkeybarry
Jack Jull
Jeremy Hunt said the same.
Not sure how I feel now.
Actually, to be fair, I do think he has the interests of the NHS at heart. Don't like his approach or general politics, but he doesn't seem like the type to irresponsibly politicise health
I skim-read this bit and had never agreed so much with the Grauniad - until I read it properly.
Schools are shut as well - the effect might be the opposite.
Dicko
Paul Stalteri
Headphone sales might increase over the next few days.
SpurMeUp
Les Howe
Do you like walking? Climb Adam's Peak and watch the sunrise.
