• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Contingency planning : When Ange is sacked, who should replace him?

Mikey10 said:
We ended up with Nuno and Ange because we couldn’t get our first (or second, or third…) choices. I hope I’m wrong, but I’m not sure we’ll be successful fishing in the kind of pool you suggest. I’m not even convinced that Iriola would come. Frank or Silva possibly would, but I worry that if there is a sacking imminent we’ll get Southgate - seems the kind of non-threatening appointment our board would love. No compensation involved either, which would make Levy’s eyes light up.
Click to expand...
I think there are two or three compellling reasons why Iriola would come.

1. Wages
2. Test himself at higher level (higher ceiling)
3. Any player that shines at Bournemouth will get poached, every year he'll have to replace 2/3 star players. A bigger club comes with that stability.
 
Sean Dyche as interim unless we can get Iraola or someone else now. Partly kidding, of course, but we need to save our ass now, it's getting critical.
 
fernadez said:
I think there are two or three compellling reasons why Iriola would come.

1. Wages
2. Test himself at higher level (higher ceiling)
3. Any player that shines at Bournemouth will get poached, every year he'll have to replace 2/3 star players. A bigger club comes with that stability.
Click to expand...

Most Spurs fans are in a weird world of "no manager will come here"

Iriola is on £1m/year, we could offer him £6m while being cheap, on a 3 year, basically we could offer the guy 18 fudging years salary that he's guaranteed to get success or fsilure.

But some fans think, oh no, he'll wait on another opportunity, who the fudge would turn down 18 years worth of their current salary? No one .. If we want him, we can get him
 
billyiddo said:
Said it before but a manager who comes in to a lower Prem team, gets them playing good football and moving in the right direction up the table is a perfect candidate for our job at this point in time - small same size obviously but it's essentially the path trod by Pochettino at Saints - there's always ifs buts and maybes but one of the biggest question marks over a manager is can they do it at this level (PL) and Iriola has shown he can. The other question mark over potential Spurs managers is can they compete against clubs stronger and with more resources? Again so far passing that with flying colours.
Click to expand...

If this was guaranteed I'd be well up for it. Alas we will never see a Poch here again IMO. Not saying Iraola might not work out, just he'll be him...
 
Probably a bit late to the party but that lad at Bournemouth seems to be doing a decent job.

I'd have that one from Saudi Sportswashing Machine on a short term basis to shore things up too.

Hurzeler is doing a decent job with few resources - another short term option.
 
We got two ways to look at this.
1) Man U changed manager. Everton changed Manager, West Ham changed manager. And all went for a permanent replacement. So either we accept that, and go for the perm manager like Iraola ideally and pay what is required

2) we take the freebie option and use Mason


Clear which option our board will take.
 
Diamond Lights said:
We got two ways to look at this.
1) Man U changed manager. Everton changed Manager, West Ham changed manager. And all went for a permanent replacement. So either we accept that, and go for the perm manager like Iraola ideally and pay what is required

2) we take the freebie option and use Mason


Clear which option our board will take.
Click to expand...
Mason would keep us up. It wouldn’t be that hard to be honest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back