Manchester United transfers: Club confirm deal to sign Wolves striker Matheus Cunha
Manchester United confirm a deal to sign Brazil and Wolves forward Matheus Cunha.
www.bbc.com
62.5 million. Lol.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Circus ManUnitus - Nobody's At The Wheel
- Thread starter Jordinho
- Start date
www.bbc.com
62.5 million. Lol.
Dicko
John Lacy
It's a real risk that one. Talented player but could well blow up in the face!Manchester United transfers: Club confirm deal to sign Wolves striker Matheus Cunha
Manchester United confirm a deal to sign Brazil and Wolves forward Matheus Cunha.
62.5 million. Lol.
I also heard today he 'walked' more than any other player in the PL lol
Yiddo
Steffen Freund
FIFY
Nah, we're going to be great. Our manager only lost all those games on purpose.
kb 1984
Nico Claesen
On arrival they will instantly turn to brick & in Jan be loaned out. That's what happens when you join utd
Kandi1977
Tony Galvin
I think he'll do well initially, but what I've seen and heard is that he wants to do his own thing, rather than follow instructions. That won't go well with Amorim. As I see it, Cunha is exactly the kind player United DON'T need.
Sancho returning to United as well. Could be fun!
Dicko
John Lacy
There's some posts going around that show both those players outperformed their normal stats more than any other players last season compared with the rest of their careers so far. I wouldn't say both are certain to work out well
ricky2tricky4city
Luka Modric
Nicely put together analysis of the (mainly financial) journey of United under the Glazers.
One could conclude the whole period has cost the price of a new Old Trafford.
Sorry state of affairs
www.bbc.co.uk
One could conclude the whole period has cost the price of a new Old Trafford.
Sorry state of affairs
How the Glazer family cost Manchester United £1.2bn
Twenty years since the Glazer family bought Manchester United BBC Verify has found £1.2bn has been spent on debt interest, debt repayments, dividends and fees to the family.
www.bbc.co.uk
jts1882
Dean Richards
If they'd started in 2005 when the Glazer's bought the club, the £600 debt the Glazers put on the club would have been enough build an excellent stadium. A billion pound stadium then would have been incredible.
The extra revenue they have lost by selling to the Glazers instead of building the stadium is probably another billion. Perhaps this might have happened if Fergie hadn't felt entitled to a million pound horse.
The extra revenue they have lost by selling to the Glazers instead of building the stadium is probably another billion. Perhaps this might have happened if Fergie hadn't felt entitled to a million pound horse.
Nicely put together analysis of the (mainly financial) journey of United under the Glazers.
One could conclude the whole period has cost the price of a new Old Trafford.
Sorry state of affairs
How the Glazer family cost Manchester United £1.2bn
Twenty years since the Glazer family bought Manchester United BBC Verify has found £1.2bn has been spent on debt interest, debt repayments, dividends and fees to the family.
English football should be grateful
United is such a commercial machine that had Glazer not burdened them with debt and run them like brick (they have matched/outspent City even with the debt), they could easily have dominated the last decade of PL.
They are fudged now, the debt plus time and money required to update their infrastructure, squad and really compete is massive, if they got all decisions right (something they seem incapable of doing)
Lost Mango
Steed Malbranque
Can someone more versed in the PSR intricacies explain to me how Man Uts can offshore £136million losses to New York and only reporting £36m loss in the UK and that be counted aginst PSR please?
Surely loss is loss no matter where it is registered for these purposes?
No expert but you have acceptable losses. Basically anything other than the cost of the first team wages, amortisation and agents fees.
Lost Mango
Steed Malbranque
Thanks
It was the way Maguire said those losses didn't count towards PSR because they were declared in US rather than UK (rather than they were 'acceptabl;e losses') that confused me.
Could be a change in the exchange rate. There's probably a detailed explanation on the net.
As i said no expert.
