No, goddamnit, he did not kick my pet. All I've got at present is a goldfish, anyway.
Sigh. I don't have an 'agenda', and I deeply dislike how casually that term is used on fan forums (not just here) to dissuade often legitimate criticism of a part of the club that some other fans feel is holy, and beyond reproach. Levy's done an average, average job so far, and will likely continue to do so in the future: it bothers me when this average model of governance for a club our size is held up as the shining standard which all clubs should aspire to, an irreproachably good way of running the club that doesn't leave a trail of broken promises, fading dreams, angry managers, and mediocrity in its wake. There was a time when I thought he was revolutionary, as good as the David Deins and Andrea Agnellis of this world: then he hit his glass ceiling, proved that he had the risk-taking panache of a frightened tortoise, proved unwilling to be even a mite philanthropic as a part-owner to boot, and then conducted the shenanigans which saw one of our most talented managers (imo) walk out and then slam the club over the farcical nature of its operations shortly afterward. Needless to say, I changed my mind.
I've been willing to eat my words for a long time now: all I want is for him to back the guy in charge in a real way, so we can return to the sort of thing we had the last time that happened (09/10). I've even mentioned it repeatedly so far this summer: if he is really serious about changing the way we operate in the window, then more power to him, and it's great that he's learned from his mistakes. Hardly a set, unchanging attitude, especially when you consider that, again, I've repeatedly said that I have nothing against the guy personally: I'm sure he's a lovely bloke in person, but he's just been an utterly mediocre chairman so far.
My only 'agenda', if you insist on labelling it that, is pointing out his mistakes in the hope that people acknowledge that they were indeed mistakes, something I believe will help us better understand the way our transfer windows work going forward (if he refuses to change his ways, of course). That's all my 'agenda' is. If that's a problem in your eyes, mate, then GHod help the state of critical discourse online, because it's utterly dead going by that diagnosis.
Surely you must admit that it is at least the most plausible explanation? Given the chain of events?