-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Cheatski are still scum
- Thread starter NewYorkSpurs
- Start date
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
Robbo
Paul Walsh
That's astonishing. And hilarious. Wow! And LOL!
K.D.D.D.D.Soc
Ian Walker
Go upstairs to your bedroom and stay up there until you're ready to apologise to us all.
It's radio silence now until we've played them.
Seeing as the prem are asking for a 12 point deduction for everton. Points deduction seems fair for chelsea. Even if it was done by previous owners.
K.D.D.D.D.Soc
Ian Walker
There's the problem, being fair and consistent is not something football administrators understand. Jump all over smaller teams but keep it nice and cosy at the top.
We're talking about the prem not uefa. The prem is run by the 20 clubs. Each has an equal vote and say.
K.D.D.D.D.Soc
Ian Walker
I wish you all good luck in your belief that they will do the right thing.
It isn't about doing the right thing. It's about self interest. The teams at the bottom will want everton punished as it might save them from relegation. The teams at the top will want city punished as it might mean they have a better chance of winning the league or getting cl. Chelsea floats between the 2 at the moment.
There is a reason that the prem are recommending everton get a 12 point deduction.
K.D.D.D.D.Soc
Ian Walker
Whatever way you look at it i don't believe they will reach a fair decision.
We'll see. Some clubs may also choose to sue as sheff utd did with west ham.
DeanoAustin
Jimmy McCormick
We have to be fair and honest about it though - our track record isn't great. Swindon were denied their promotion to the Premier in the early 90s and actually relegated another division for financial irregularities (albeit the relegation was overturned on appeal). A few years later, we were proven to be acting like a bank for our players and got away with a 12 point deduction (which was overturned), being chucked out of the FA Cup (which was also overturned) and a fine (which, from memory, went from 600k to 1.5m on appeal). We were lucky boys to stay in the Premier after that.
The World In Action programme on how we operated in the 80s is eye opening. It's on You Tube from memory.
El Guepardo
Rafael Van Der Vaart
I thought that some of those penalties were to be applied due to the way that we treated the intertoto cup? At least that’s my memory of it. But there was less coverage of it at the time due to being pre main internet days etc
DeanoAustin
Jimmy McCormick
Pretty sure it was down to financial irregularities solely. The Intertoto Cup didn't kick off under UEFA until 1995 and we got the above punishments prior to the 94-95 season. I know we got a lot of brick for fielding the stiffs in the Intertoto but don't recall being punished for it.
El Guepardo
Rafael Van Der Vaart
I expect that you’re right. It would make a lot more sense than my memory of it.
Along with Wimbledon we got a one season ban from European competitions, which was later scrapped. Not that it mattered much at the time.
K.D.D.D.D.Soc
Ian Walker
I think it was about irregular payments to players we were signing, again I believe Alan Sugar had passed the information to the FA as they had been made by the previous ownership and also informed Inland Revenue.