https://link.chelseafc.com/1WUW/76191a48
Tbf the slippery fudge has played a bit of a PR blinder there.
Sounds like he's gone balls out on being allowed back in to the UK.Yep. Wonder how putin will view it?
If you're already that much of a clam, why not double down?Looks like connor mcgregor might be interested. Where he'll get the money is anyones guess.
https://www.football.london/chelsea-fc/news/conor-mcgregor-roman-abramovich-chelsea-23267960
What did he pay for them?Please translate this for me, as I desperately want Cheatski to be asset stripped and sent to hell. What does this mean in plain terms, if someone comes along with £1bn and Roman agrees to sell it... what happens next to the £1bn?
"I will not be asking for any loans to be repaid.....Moreover, I have instructed my team to set up a charitable foundation where all net proceeds from the sale will be donated. The foundation will be for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine. This includes providing critical funds towards the urgent and immediate needs of victims, as well as supporting the long-term work of recovery."
Not just PR. On the face of it he's done (from an objective non-Spurs view) a very good thing.https://link.chelseafc.com/1WUW/76191a48
Tbf the slippery fudge has played a bit of a PR blinder there.
Sounds like he's gone balls out on being allowed back in to the UK.
What money?Or is trying to not get sanctioned (which would block the sale). "You can't stop the sale, the money is going to help ukrainian victims".
Nothing stoping him changing his mind once the money is in his bank account.
What money?
Unless I've completely misunderstood, he's only getting his stake back. The loans are written off and the profits on the sale are going to the charity.
Just checked, £140M to go to him. A lot for any of us but pocket change to him.
There's no buyer yet, so no figure quoted. From Romans press release:Not read the details just his statement. Who controls the charity? How much is the club being sold for?
His peopleNot read the details just his statement. Who controls the charity? How much is the club being sold for?
No. He's decided which side of history he wants to fall on.Not just PR. On the face of it he's done (from an objective non-Spurs view) a very good thing.
I didn't comment on his reasoning.No. He's decided which side of history he wants to fall on.
It's an attempt to remove himself as a target for any Govt. He's already sucked the rooster of the devil to get where he is. This isn't philanthropy, it's self preservation.
No. He's decided which side of history he wants to fall on.
It's an attempt to remove himself as a target for any Govt. He's already sucked the rooster of the devil to get where he is. This isn't philanthropy, it's self preservation.