• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Cheatski are still scum

K.D.D.D.D.Soc said:
Have their fans managed to racially abuse anyone in Malmo yet?
Click to expand...

Chelsea and Malmo have been charged by UEFA following supporter unrest during their Europa League match in Sweden.

Chelsea have been charged over field invasions by their supporters, and Malmo for setting off fireworks.
Both clubs have been charged with the throwing of objects by their fans during the last 32 tie, which Chelsea won 2-1.
 
nayimfromthehalfwayline said:
I always question a manager who cannot (will not?) adapt.

Its all well and good having a preferred system, but if you dont have the tools to use it you really shouldnt just bluntly force it in anyway.

First things first for any manager must be to get the best out of what they have.

And then, if desired, change things over time to what they would prefer.

What he is doing at Chelsea is utterly baffling.
Click to expand...

Adapting to the players they have and not repeating the same mistakes would seem a fundamental issue for a good manager.

I was convinced AVB would learn from his mistakes at Chelsea and do well for us. He repeated many of the same mistakes.

While the merry-go-round for relegation teams might be different, based on new manager bounces (although how far can Allardyce bounce?), for top managers the issue of adaptability is important. Mourinho was briliant at Porto, Chelsea (first time) and Inter, and improved Real's CL performance, but he seems to have completely lost the plot. Wenger was exceptional at Arsenal in his first decade, but unable to adapt in the second. Ferguson is one who seemed able to adapt despite his old-school reputation. The big questionmark is Guardiola. He has done well at Barcelona, Bayen and City, but hasn't really been tested with adversity.
 
parklane1 said:
Sorry mate that is not true, he was the only player who caused Utd any problems. He is too good for them.
Click to expand...

United are brick defensively, causing them problems is the minimum you’d expect of any attacking PL player.

He completely disappeared against us in the league, likewise City, he doesn’t put up the numbers the justify his reputation.
 
galeforce said:
United are brick defensively, causing them problems is the minimum you’d expect of any attacking PL player.

He completely disappeared against us in the league, likewise City, he doesn’t put up the numbers the justify his reputation.
Click to expand...

Well if you do not think he is a top player we have to disagree.
 
galeforce said:
United are brick defensively, causing them problems is the minimum you’d expect of any attacking PL player.

He completely disappeared against us in the league, likewise City, he doesn’t put up the numbers the justify his reputation.
Click to expand...

On the flip.

He destroyed us in the league cup.

He should have won a pen in the league game as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back