• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Ballon d'Or

Funny that Kane all of a sudden is in the top ten when he keeps performing (and not winning trophies) for a more fashionable club. Silly me for thinking this was an individual award.
 
Funny that Kane all of a sudden is in the top ten when he keeps performing (and not winning trophies) for a more fashionable club. Silly me for thinking this was an individual award.

It's almost been a requirement to play for either Real or Barca. I can see why they were shocked it went to someone in the PL.
 
In the old days, when football brick.

Don’t get me wrong, he was fudging brilliant, but levels behind Zidane and Modric, who are probably both in footballs all time best 11.

Google it. Most sites has cruyff above them. He is one of the greatest players of all time. Nearly all have him top 10 if not top 5.
 
Google it. Most sites has cruyff above them. He is one of the greatest players of all time. Nearly all have him top 10 if not top 5.

everyone is welcome to their opinion

I think football evolves, the level only goes one way, athleticism and fitness is a huge part of it too
 
everyone is welcome to their opinion

I think football evolves, the level only goes one way, athleticism and fitness is a huge part of it too

You can only judge someone for their time period. The competition they had.

They are great players. True legends. That should be enough.
 
everyone is welcome to their opinion

I think football evolves, the level only goes one way, athleticism and fitness is a huge part of it too

And Cruyff would have been fitter and more athletic, his skills would have transferred magnificently into the modern game.

Would Modric have shone on crappy surfaces with less/zero protection from 'proper' tackling?

The game does evolve, players are as you say, more athletic and fitter, but they aren't more skillful. Just the playing surfaces and technology improvements alone (balls and boots alone come to mind), let alone the levels of professionalism and training knowledge, mean you can do more.
 
And Cruyff would have been fitter and more athletic, his skills would have transferred magnificently into the modern game.

Would Modric have shone on crappy surfaces with less/zero protection from 'proper' tackling?

The game does evolve, players are as you say, more athletic and fitter, but they aren't more skillful. Just the playing surfaces and technology improvements alone (balls and boots alone come to mind), let alone the levels of professionalism and training knowledge, mean you can do more.

You realise modric started in the bosnian league then croatian? He shone enough to get a big money (at the time) move to us.
 
You realise modric started in the bosnian league then croatian? He shone enough to get a big money (at the time) move to us.

Totally but even there the standard of reffing and protection is miles ahead of what happened globally in the 60s and 70s.

I'm not downgrading Modric, absolutely a world class player, but think there are those who dismiss the 'legends' because the game has moved on and 'improved' without attributing a significant proportion of that improvement to the external factors rather than just pure ability.

This idea that fotball was brick pre-1992 is BS. It was different but there was massive amounts of skill and the game had much more about it than many of today's artistic or 'tactical' borefests.
 
Back