I was Ange in again after Bilbao. I have no problem admitting now that my renewed stance was all emotional.
I think the board took a bold, mature and well timed decision parting ways with Ange. The results and performances over time were not good enough, but that should take nothing away from our excellent cup run and deserved Europa league trophy. Like others, I will be forever grateful for Bilbao.
There is no guarantee the new guy will outperform Ange, but given the circumstances, the board had to act one way or another. Boards should have the best interest of the club/business as their top priority, and that sometimes means making unpopular and risky decisions. I'm sure they have assessed all variables and come to the conclusion that a change of manager is the best way forward for the club. Time will show if they were right.
If the rumours of Ange overruling the medical team's advice is true, that's for me a deciding factor. We were ravaged by injuries last season, and absolutely have to make sure we don't find ourself in a similar situation again. If Ange has had a negative impact on player fitness from being stubborn and ignoring advice, that's reason enough to part ways, IMO.
I don't celebrate the sacking. We have a lot to thank him for, and he's a very likable character (IMO) and by all reports a genuinely good human being. In a world increasingly lead by ignorant sociopaths and facists, we should be grateful for having a decent man in charge of our great club for two years, even if it didn't work out as well as we hoped (Bilbao aside).