Out of interest how does his actions help him and not hinder him? Surely closing one area of voting would hurt anyone with in the election? Is there a trend that says anti Trump voters are more likely to vote by mail?
Its a genuine question because from a totally outsiders view it would appear to me that if you closed off postal votes you would have to already have a pact in place with your own voters to go to the polling stations and that would be an impossible pact to set no?
Is there a demographic that would vote for Biden who would preferably vote via post and not in person?
Even in a pandemic on the outside, restricting the postal vote would have an even negative effect?
All of those are clear and obviously a danger to democracy.Closing of polling stations in black and hispanic areas (yet increasing them in already over-represented white areas.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Higher death rates in BAME communities due to COVID so they are less willing/likely to line up and wait hours to vote at the fewer voting stations they are allowed to vote at.
Deliberate voter suppression through preventing early physical voting, requirement of voter ID (less BAME have ID than others as fewer say have passports or driving licences)
All these suppress the black/hispanic/poor vote - people who on balance tend to vote less Republican so it works in Trump's favour.
It's not perfect, but at least he speaks like a damn leader.
All of those are clear and obviously a danger to democracy.
But as I've mentioned here before, calling him out for things he's not doing will only weaken our case in trying to defend democracy against people like him.
When incompetence is a possible reason for an action or set of actions, always assume incompetence.
It's not perfect, but at least he speaks like a damn leader.
the problem still remains will people assume he’s going to win, or actually go and vote.
That's a common point made by conspiracy theorists. The usual counter is that conspiracies are rarely true as large numbers of people are terrible at keeping secrets.In this case it is naive to assume that is the only reason.
is that why hilary didnt win in 2016?
The only way Biden loses is if Trump cheats enough.https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/biden-abcs-david-muir-shut-country-prevent-spread/story?id=72519690
I think this may cost him the election
The only way Biden loses is if Trump cheats enough.
There was a variety of reasons why Trump won last time. Complacency was certainly one of them. But the midterms and intervening elections, even those that have happened during the pandemic, have shown that it won't be a factor this time. Turnout will be high and that spells trouble for Trump.or if people take the same attitude as before
“he won’t win”
There was a variety of reasons why Trump won last time. Complacency was certainly one of them. But the midterms and intervening elections, even those that have happened during the pandemic, have shown that it won't be a factor this time. Turnout will be high and that spells trouble for Trump.
That's a common point made by conspiracy theorists. The usual counter is that conspiracies are rarely true as large numbers of people are terrible at keeping secrets.
The one thing Trump has been consistent about in his presidency is saying the quiet bits loud. He hasn't done that so it's a bit of a stretch to suggest he's suddenly developed the skill of not saying what he's not supposed to say.