It's still early enough for both to disappear into obscurity.Bit of a turn up with Cruz winning but Iowa is a weird place with lots of religious nuts and farmers,Trump has performed well as a front runner, it'll be interesting to see how he performs after a setback of sorts.
When will/should the number of candidates get narrowed down?
How about Bernie?! He was 50 points down on Clinton in Iowa when they started the campaign. Yesterday, he was just 0.4% away from her.
If he wins the next one, he'll have even more momentum behind him, and the wavering democrats might think that he can actually win and give him their vote.
The longer it goes, I think the more people will dislike Clinton.
I can imagine most 'Murricans would prefer a mental to a socialistHe'll get trounced if he wins the nomination
I can imagine most 'Murricans would prefer a mental to a socialist
We are defined by our actions, not how we describe ourselves. Otherwise Captain Bellend would be the best manager in the world and rSol the most honest footballer.Exactly this. "Nobody will vote for a socialist" (which he's not; a Democratic Socialist is a different animal entirely)
The thing is, Obama was labelled a socialist (amongst many other things) and it didn't scare people off. I think the Republican abuse of Obama over the years means that not enough people are going to be taken in by the hyperbole, should Bernie actually win the nomination. And he currently polls very well against Trump, who is still the Republican front runner. Calling Obama and Obama care socialism, as the Republicans have continually done, has really made the word, or the idea of socialism, a more positive thing for many Americans. For those that it still scares, they would be voting Republican anyway.
It will be a different scale. Obama was only labelled a socialist by the loonies and the tea party (same thing?) and certainly never spoke about himself on those terms. Certainly there have been Republican attacks on Obama's programme (particularly during his second term) but that is par for the course for Democrat presidents.
Sanders would be a liability if he won the nomination and I think that he would lose to any of the Republican nominees who stand a chance of running for office. I would agree that Clinton divides opinion and is not a popular politician but I think that she would be a strong favourite against any of her possible opponents.
The point is that the word 'socialism' isn't the turn off for many Americans that it once was. Obamacare = socialism has been rammed down peoples throats, but many Americans are benefiting from it. Medicare is another example. These things are hated by the loons on the right, and none of them will be voting democrat anyway, but many people like them and have a positive view of this perceived socialism.
A lot will depend on who wins for the Republicans, but if Trump comes through, then his attacks would be seen as pure hyperbole because that is all he does. And it's probably why Sanders polls so well against him (see my earlier link).
The point is that the word 'socialism' isn't the turn off for many Americans that it once was. Obamacare = socialism has been rammed down peoples throats, but many Americans are benefiting from it. Medicare is another example. These things are hated by the loons on the right, and none of them will be voting democrat anyway, but many people like them and have a positive view of this perceived socialism.
A lot will depend on who wins for the Republicans, but if Trump comes through, then his attacks would be seen as pure hyperbole because that is all he does. And it's probably why Sanders polls so well against him (see my earlier link).