We sold Vuskovich for 50 and have supposedly turned down more for Bergvall so 70 for Gakpo is about right
Yeh thats a fair shout.
Can't remember the source but there was some talk that they wanted £72m. Might have been some ITK BS.
Gordon looks like a good deal now.
The heatmaps show porro staying behind lamal and not overlapping to help. Same with kudus.You have been saying that for weeks with absolutely no evidence to support it other than your biased opinion - which is completely debunked by facts... including Porro's heatmaps.
I posted this in the thread Savinho and you did not miss it...The heatmaps show porro staying behind lamal and not overlapping to help. Same with kudus.
I posted this in the porro thread, you may have missed it
Post in thread 'Pedro Porro' http://www.glory-glory.co.uk/threads/pedro-porro.11593/post-2063438

That's what I'm referring to , Porro doesn't overlap to the touch line. He hangs about before the penalty box ready to cross. But seldom overlaps lamal to help shake off the defender. Kudus double teamed and overworked before he got injured, same porro.I posted this in the thread Savinho and you did not miss it...
View attachment 23052
But I guess why let facts come in the way of a conspiracy....
That's what I'm referring to , Porro doesn't overlap to the touch line. He hangs about before the penalty box ready to cross. But seldom overlaps lamal to help shake off the defender. Kudus double teamed and overworked before he got injured, same porro.
Hm, but Liverpool aren't PL champions, hard to take serious someone who gets the basics so wrong.David Ornstein has very much downplayed a move for Gakpo.
"Liverpool have received no contact or bids for Cody Gakpo despite interest from Tottenham Hotspur.
The Premier League champions are planning to strengthen their attack, not weaken it, and have no intention of selling the Dutch forward. Gakpo remains under a long-term contract, with confidence that new head coach Andoni Iraola can get the best out of him."
He has since edited his post to say 'former' champions.Hm, but Liverpool aren't PL champions, hard to take serious someone who gets the basics so wrong.
I think it is very much a long shot... why should Liverpool sell?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.